2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing dopant activation in Si:P double δ-layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the direction normal to the dopant plane, the δ-layer is separated from its periodic images by 40 atomic layers, which affords an adequate degree of electronic separation. In the in-plane direction a (4 × 4) unit cell of 16 atoms (with 4 P and 12 Si in the δ-layer representing the measured 2.4 × 10 14 cm –2 dopant density) is used. The use of a (4 × 4) unit cell necessitates a subsequent unfolding of the calculated band minima to their position in the (1 × 1) Brillouin zone that is probed in experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the direction normal to the dopant plane, the δ-layer is separated from its periodic images by 40 atomic layers, which affords an adequate degree of electronic separation. In the in-plane direction a (4 × 4) unit cell of 16 atoms (with 4 P and 12 Si in the δ-layer representing the measured 2.4 × 10 14 cm –2 dopant density) is used. The use of a (4 × 4) unit cell necessitates a subsequent unfolding of the calculated band minima to their position in the (1 × 1) Brillouin zone that is probed in experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentally determined value is centrally placed within the range of reported calculated values; 6 to 270 meV. This wide range of values arises because the calculated valley splitting is sensitive to the arrangement of dopants in the δ-layer, , as well as to other physical parameters such as dopant density, the confinement potential (related to dopant segregation), and to the particular calculational approach used. The preparation recipe used here is known to reliably produce a dense (2.4 × 10 14 cm –2 ) and narrow (<1 nm wide) dopant profile , that can be well represented in the calculations. The lack of periodicity in the δ-layer states, after removing the surface Umklapp process (Figure b), supports the notion of a dopant layer that lacks long-range order, but does not exclude the likely possibility of local ordering. , We therefore primarily attribute the discrepancy between the measured and calculated valley splitting values to an ill-defined dopant arrangement in the δ-layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To circumvent this problem, and thus to increase the total amount of donors, here we propose to stack several δ layers separated by a thin Ge spacer of high crystalline and morphological quality. The stacking of multiple ALD layers has proven to be difficult in both Si [12] and Ge [13]. This is mainly due to the need for preserving the precision of a single ALD layer while maintaining an atomically flat surface of the encapsulation layer which will act, in turn, as the substrate for the subsequent layer of the ALD stack.…”
Section: (Some Figures In This Article Are In Colour Only In the Elec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron mobility in CVD graphene [ 32 ] can be within the range 800–16000 cm 2 V −1 s −1 (although higher mobilities have been found with suspended exfoliated graphene, [ 32 ] the upper limit is far smaller when incorporated into a device), whereas with Si:P δ‐layers μ ≈ 100 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . [ 34 ] The electron density of graphene [ 35 ] is limited to approximately two orders of magnitude lower than maximally doped Si:P δ‐layers, for which [ 36 ] n 2D ≈ 1 × 10 14 cm −2 . Additionally, the kinetic inductance must be considered for low dimension, high mobility transmission lines, as dominance of the inductance can induce parasitic plasmonics resonances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%