Optimized Workflow for On-Line Derivatization for Targeted Metabolomics Approach by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Using manual derivatization in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry samples have varying equilibration times before analysis which increases technical variability and limits the number of potential samples analyzed. By contrast, automated derivatization methods can derivatize and inject each sample in an identical manner. We present a fully automated (on-line) derivatization method used for targeted analysis of different matrices. We describe method optimization and compare results from using off-line and on-line derivatization protocols, including the robustness and reproducibility of the methods. Our final parameters for the derivatization process were 20 µL of methoxyamine (MeOx) in pyridine for 60 min at 30 °C followed by 80 µL N-Methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoracetamide (MSTFA) for 30 min at 30 °C combined with 4 h of equilibration time. The repeatability test in plasma and liver revealed a median relative standard deviation (RSD) of 16% and 10%, respectively. Serum samples showed a consistent intra-batch median RSD of 20% with an inter-batch variability of 27% across three batches. The direct comparison of on-line versus off-line demonstrated that on-line was fit for purpose and improves repeatability with a measured median RSD of 11% compared to 17% using the same method off-line. In summary, we recommend that optimized on-line methods may improve results for metabolomics and should be used where available.

Chewing the fat: How lipidomics is changing our understanding of human health and disease in 2022

“…Here, pre‐treatment approaches, such as solid‐phase extraction (SPE) or derivatisation, for example, esterification, silylation, or charge‐switch derivatisation, can drastically increase analyte sensitivity and/or decrease matrix effects 41,79–83 . Disadvantages associated with both SPE and derivatisation include their costs, time‐consuming, and cumbersome nature, as well as issues with repeatability due to either batch‐to‐batch variation in sorbents or reagents and/or analyst consistency 78,84–88 …”

“… 41 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 Disadvantages associated with both SPE and derivatisation include their costs, time‐consuming, and cumbersome nature, as well as issues with repeatability due to either batch‐to‐batch variation in sorbents or reagents and/or analyst consistency. 78 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 …”

Tapping into Plant–Microbiome Interactions through the Lens of Multi-Omics Techniques

“…Multiple technologies can be used in tandem to profile an entire extract, and overlapping data should be combined to create a complete profile [ 122 ]. The type of extraction method used, such as liquid–liquid extraction or solid-phase extraction, etc., can affect recovery, reproducibility, and specificity in metabolite detection, thus necessitating the development of optimal extraction methods [ 123 ]. The selection of extraction solvents is also crucial.…”

Application of Doehlert Experimental Design for Optimization of a New-Based Hydrophilic Interaction Solid-Phase Extraction of Phenolic Acids from Olive Oils

“…These compounds are thermolabile [ 18 ], so they require derivatization before analysis [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. This additional treatment generally leads to stability problems for these compounds.…”