2009
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2009.2021359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization on MOS-Triggered SCR Structures for On-Chip ESD Protection

Abstract: MOS-triggered silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) devices have been reported to achieve efficient on-chip electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection in deep-submicrometer CMOS technology. The channel length of the embedded MOS transistor in the MOS-triggered SCR device dominates the trigger mechanism and current distribution to govern the trigger voltage, holding voltage, on resistance, second breakdown current, and ESD robustness of the MOS-triggered SCR device. The embedded MOS transistor in the MOS-triggered S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proposed ESD protection circuit increased the holding voltage from 2.9 V to 5.8 V through a structural transformation of the conventional LRSCR; therefore, it is suitable for the 5 V class ESD design window and has a higher current driving capability through the excellent parallel discharge path [33,34]. In summary, since the holding voltage of the conventional LRSCR is lower than the proposed LDO regulator's maximum operating voltage of 4.5 V, a latch-up problem occurs [35]. So, even if the conventional LRSCR is embedded in the proposed LDO regulator, reliability cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the proposed ESD protection circuit increased the holding voltage from 2.9 V to 5.8 V through a structural transformation of the conventional LRSCR; therefore, it is suitable for the 5 V class ESD design window and has a higher current driving capability through the excellent parallel discharge path [33,34]. In summary, since the holding voltage of the conventional LRSCR is lower than the proposed LDO regulator's maximum operating voltage of 4.5 V, a latch-up problem occurs [35]. So, even if the conventional LRSCR is embedded in the proposed LDO regulator, reliability cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To reduce the trigger voltage and enhance the turn-on efficiency of SCR, some advanced techniques such as gate-coupled technique [5], substrate-triggered technique [6], static triggered technique [7] and base-modulated technique [8] are employed. Recently, an initial-on PMOS-triggered SCR device is reported [9] and further optimizations on the MOS-triggered SCR devices for ESD protection are studied [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, based on the optimized merged MOS-triggered SCR structure in [10], a compact MOS-triggered SCR is proposed, which has a lower trigger voltage, a faster turn-on speed, a lower on-resistance, a lower clamped voltage and a higher failure current than the merged MOS-triggered SCR counterpart. The high turn-on efficiency, low clamping voltage and high failure current characteristics make this power clamp device more attractive in advanced CMOS process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pad-based local clamping scheme (Fig. 1b) [3] incorporating SCR-based devices with trigger mechanism [4][5][6] or resistive devices [7] reduces the pad voltage build-up by avoiding the power buses. However, similar to the railbased design, two ESD devices are required for current shunting in both directions (from I/O pad to power buses and vice versa).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%