2014
DOI: 10.4236/ajac.2014.59061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Solid Phase Microextraction Procedure Followed by Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture Detector for Pesticides Butachlor and Chlorpyrifos

Abstract: In this study, headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by gas chromatography using electron capture detection system (GC-ECD) were developed for the determination of chloraacetanilide (butachlor) and chlorpyrifos presented in biological samples. Different parameters affecting the extraction procedure were optimized including extraction time (30 minutes), extraction temperature (80˚C), sample volume (3 mL), sample pH (2), added NaCl (0.3 gram) and sample stirring rate (400 rpm). Different conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current methods used to monitor herbicide residues include LC with ultraviolet [9,10] or MS/MS detectors [11][12][13], and GC with flame ionization [14], electron capture [15,16], or MS detectors [17][18][19]. LC-MS is widely used and the triple quadrupole MS has become a routine detection tool for the analysis of multiresidue pesticides and veterinary drug residues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods used to monitor herbicide residues include LC with ultraviolet [9,10] or MS/MS detectors [11][12][13], and GC with flame ionization [14], electron capture [15,16], or MS detectors [17][18][19]. LC-MS is widely used and the triple quadrupole MS has become a routine detection tool for the analysis of multiresidue pesticides and veterinary drug residues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of traditional sample preparation techniques have actuated a growing tendency towards new, inexpensive, and quite fast approaches. In this regard, several novel techniques such as solid phase extraction (SPE) [33,34], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [35,36], matrix solidphase dispersion (MSPD) [37,38], stir bar sorption extraction (SBSE) [39,40], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [41], accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [42,43] and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [44,45] have been developed in order to improve organic material extraction throughput in terms of time, solvent consumption, reproducibility and enrichment factor (EF). Despite the benefits of these methods, all of them suffer from lack of selectivity limiting their application in large-scale analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%