2019
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Membrane Electrode Assembly of PEM Fuel Cell by Response Surface Method

Abstract: The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) plays an important role in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance. Typically, the structure comprises of a polymer electrolyte membrane sandwiched by agglomerate catalyst layers at the anode and cathode. Optimization of various parameters in the design of MEA is, thus, essential for reducing cost and material usage, while improving cell performance. In this paper, optimization of MEA is performed using a validated two-phase PEMFC numerical model. Key ME… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the response surface plot for power density versus the membrane and catalyst layer thickness. As seen in the figure, the power density increases with a decrease in the thickness size of the membrane and catalyst layer thickness [18]. Both parameters play a significant role in the PEM fuel cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows the response surface plot for power density versus the membrane and catalyst layer thickness. As seen in the figure, the power density increases with a decrease in the thickness size of the membrane and catalyst layer thickness [18]. Both parameters play a significant role in the PEM fuel cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods can be employed to obtain optimal conditions from a minimum number of experiments. This method is effective in optimizing PEM fuel cell operating parameters [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the influence of each factor on the objective functions, the response surfaces are generated for the two objective functions using the GA method 40 . The response surfaces confirm the reliability of the predictions via the evaluation of “goodness of fit.” 41 The accuracy of the assessment can be determined by performing CFD simulations for the verification points 36 . If the result of the verification point is not within the proper range of goodness of fit, the point would be added as a refined point, and the response surface is then modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… and Vuppala et al. . In our case, we are trying to capture the response of degradation rate with known design levers, temperature and humidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%