2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09116a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of makerspace microfabrication techniques and materials for the realization of planar, 3D printed microelectrode arrays in under four days

Abstract: “Makerspace microfabrication” with the use of simple tools and materials is used to demonstrate the realization of 2D microelectrode arrays (MEAs) having a density of up to 8 × 8 MEAs in under four days which are comparable to conventional MEAs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of "Makerspace Microfabrication" has been demonstrated previously by the authors to realize a 2D MEA up to a commercially popular 8 Â 8 array as stated earlier. 24 The present work differs from the earlier reported method on several fronts. First, we use different toolbox technologies present in the makerspace environment to realize microneedle electrodes in 3D instead of 2D electrodes as reported in our prior work.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The use of "Makerspace Microfabrication" has been demonstrated previously by the authors to realize a 2D MEA up to a commercially popular 8 Â 8 array as stated earlier. 24 The present work differs from the earlier reported method on several fronts. First, we use different toolbox technologies present in the makerspace environment to realize microneedle electrodes in 3D instead of 2D electrodes as reported in our prior work.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…5 Recently, 3D printing of photopolymeric resins have been reported to realize MEAs having electrode densities up to a commercially popular 8 Â 8 array allowing for the MEAs to be "used and tossed" and moving the manufacturing from the cleanroom to makerspaces. 24 The use of makerspace techniques compares very favorably with traditional glass MEAs in terms of design to device while representing a dramatic reduction in cost, timeline for fabrication, reduction in the number of steps and the need for sophisticated microfabrication and packaging equipment along with the capability of monolithic microfabrication of the device and package for seamless integration with commercial data acquisition and amplication systems. 24 In this paper, the microfabrication and packaging of a stainless steel (SS) 3D MEA assembled on a glass substrate is reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically to this end, nanomaterial electroplating or electroless plating has been one highly used method for increasing the surface area of microelectrodes, in order to help better extract biologically relevant data 43 . The micro-texturing inherent in 3D printing could aid in impedance reduction for these interfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%