2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-016-6064-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of elecrospinning process of zein using central composite design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scaffolding conditions are improved by adjusting the electrospinning parameters, which include the needle measurement, the collector, the voltage, and the pumped polymer quantity. After optimization of conditions [24], bead-free fibers with a minimum diameter were obtained. To that end, the needle's distance to the collector was 20 cm, the voltage was 8 kV, and the polymer flow was 0.5 mL/h, and a blend of 8% PCL and 5% I. graveolens were found to be suitable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaffolding conditions are improved by adjusting the electrospinning parameters, which include the needle measurement, the collector, the voltage, and the pumped polymer quantity. After optimization of conditions [24], bead-free fibers with a minimum diameter were obtained. To that end, the needle's distance to the collector was 20 cm, the voltage was 8 kV, and the polymer flow was 0.5 mL/h, and a blend of 8% PCL and 5% I. graveolens were found to be suitable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average fiber diameter was determined as 1.1 ± 0.3 µm at 25% RH and 0.7 ± 0.2 µm at 50% RH whereby the diameter of merged fibers was considered as the fiber diameter of one fiber. Despite fusion of fibers, the average fiber diameter of zein fibers electrospun at 50% RH was slightly lower than reported in the literature for zein fibers [ 23 , 28 ]. The smaller fiber diameter could be explained by a much lower flow rate used in comparison to the literature [ 30 ], where a decrease in flow rate has been shown to lead to a decreased fiber diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It has been reported that the morphology and fiber diameter are strongly influenced by solvent and processing parameters, e.g., the polymer concentration, solvent factors, applied voltage, tip-target distance and flow rate, as well as ambient parameters [ 27 ]. All fiber mats were electrospun at 10 cm and 15 cm tip-to-target distance, but no significant change in the average fiber diameter and fiber morphology could be detected, which was also investigated and found by Miri et al [ 28 ]. Therefore, neat zein fiber mats were electrospun at 10 cm distance, whereas the blends were electrospun at 15 cm distance, which was the working distance optimized by Dippold et al [ 14 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Only a few studies reported the effects of processing factors or solvent types on the electrospun zein fibers [12,13]. However, only one comprehensive optimization study for electrospinning of zein has been reported, up to now [14]. This optimization study is different in the way of taking the effects of multiple variables acting simultaneously into account by using Taguchi's orthogonal design to produce nanofibers from zein.…”
Section: Electrospunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean diameters of these fibers range from 106 to 264 nm (Table 4). However, Selling et al and Miri et al produced nanofibers with larger diameters (above 400 nm) from the zein solution in HAc, probably due to the combined effect of higher voltage (above 20 kv) and higher zein concentrations used in their study [12,14].…”
Section: Morphologies Of Zein Nanofibersmentioning
confidence: 99%