2019
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1603157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of composite cryoprotectant for freeze-drying Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01 by response surface methodology

Abstract: Freeze drying has been well applied in the preparation of high-efficiency probiotic powders. However, the process is generally accompanied by probiotic viability deficiency, which is the bottleneck for further application. To improve the viability of Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01 during freeze-drying, we optimized the cryoprotectant of B. bifidum BB01 by response surface methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD). In this study, two values of B. bifidum BB01 with different protectant factors were i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They used different cryoprotectants and evaluated the survival rate and viable cell numbers per unit weight of the resulting freeze-dried powder. The results suggested that the best cryoprotectant for B. bifidum was xylooligosaccharides with the survival rate and the viable cell numbers per unit weight of powder were around 90% and 11 logs, respectively (Chen et al, 2019). Another study using freezedrying with Bifidobacterium spp.…”
Section: Drying Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used different cryoprotectants and evaluated the survival rate and viable cell numbers per unit weight of the resulting freeze-dried powder. The results suggested that the best cryoprotectant for B. bifidum was xylooligosaccharides with the survival rate and the viable cell numbers per unit weight of powder were around 90% and 11 logs, respectively (Chen et al, 2019). Another study using freezedrying with Bifidobacterium spp.…”
Section: Drying Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially compounds stabilizing intra-cellular structures must be absorbed by the cells before the freezing process begins. For example, skim milk is not absorbed by microorganisms but forms a protective layer on the cell surface whereas other protectants may permeate the cell wall or cell membrane [22]. This applies to sugars such as trehalose, maltose or lactose, which in general enhance the glass transition temperature, thereby restricting the molecular mobility and thus stabilizing the cells during freeze-drying [23,24].…”
Section: Cryoprotectantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skim milk (20% w/v) provided the highest protection for cell survival at 89.26% followed by lactose (10% w/v) with 87.78% survival rate. Skim milk is one of the most preferable protective agents and widely studied for freeze-drying of various types of bacteria [16,[28][29][30]. Proteins and calcium in the skim milk may contribute to cell protection from the extreme and harsh conditions of the freeze-drying process by forming a protective coating on the cell wall [31].…”
Section: Selection Of Protective Agents For Bioformulation Of P Polymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the considered cell viability of P. polymyxa Kp10 after freeze-drying was mainly affected by types and concentrations of the protective agent. To determine the optimal protective agent combination, the ranges of skim milk concentration (10%-30% w/v), lactose (5%-15% w/v), and sucrose (15%-40% w/v) were chosen based on the previous preliminary test and several other reported studies [11,28,30,40].…”
Section: Experimental Design For Optimization Of Protective Agent Commentioning
confidence: 99%