2018 21st Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/dsd.2018.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Circuits for IBM's Five-Qubit Quantum Computers

Abstract: IBM has made several quantum computers available to researchers around the world via cloud services. Two architectures with five qubits, one with 16, and one with 20 qubits are available to run experiments. The IBM architectures implement gates from the Clifford+T gate library. However, each architecture only implements a subset of the possible CNOT gates. In this paper, we show how Clifford+T circuits can efficiently be mapped into the two IBM quantum computers with 5 qubits. We further present an algorithm a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our experiment on simulator we followed the same principle and architecture design we explained in QuClassi design and we trained each epoch through IRIS data set with 8000 shots (number of repetitions of each circuit) to calculate the loss of the circuit. Based on our observation and previous research in this area [54,22] the integrity of physical qubits and T1, T2 errors of IBM-Q machines could vary, however, our design managed to attain an optimal solution after few iterations, comparable to the simulator results we attained. Since Machine learning applications, unlike chemistry or other noise-sensitive applications, can tolerate more noise within the system, running experiment on actual quantum machines generated stable results and accuracy similar to the simulators.…”
Section: Ibm-q Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similar to our experiment on simulator we followed the same principle and architecture design we explained in QuClassi design and we trained each epoch through IRIS data set with 8000 shots (number of repetitions of each circuit) to calculate the loss of the circuit. Based on our observation and previous research in this area [54,22] the integrity of physical qubits and T1, T2 errors of IBM-Q machines could vary, however, our design managed to attain an optimal solution after few iterations, comparable to the simulator results we attained. Since Machine learning applications, unlike chemistry or other noise-sensitive applications, can tolerate more noise within the system, running experiment on actual quantum machines generated stable results and accuracy similar to the simulators.…”
Section: Ibm-q Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Figure 1(a) shows a representation of an input circuit. The target architecture to which we intend to compile our quantum algorithm is represented using an undirected graph called a coupling graph, G = (V, E), with vertices V and edges E. Each physical qubit is represented as a vertex v ∈ V and the two-qubit gates available between physical qubits are represented by edges (u, v) ∈ E between vertices u and v. We do not consider direction for the edges in this paper; however, our algorithm can be adapted to the case of devices with a particular direction for two-qubit gates as in the case of [28]. Figure 1(b) shows the coupling graph of the IBM Q20 Tokyo chip as an example target architecture [29].…”
Section: The Placement and Routing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 (b). Further, the qubits are chosen such that the circuit after transpilation has a minimal circuit cost [10]. According to the measurement results announced by Alice, Bob 1 and Bob 2 apply corresponding unitaries to obtain the teleported states.…”
Section: Multi-output Quantum Teleportation Using Two Bell Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%