2012
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2011.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising container storage processes at multimodal terminals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Casey & Kozan (2012), a model is studied in which the objective is to minimize the total time needed to perform all movements. They consider both incoming and outgoing containers and propose both constructive and meta-heuristics to solve the problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Casey & Kozan (2012), a model is studied in which the objective is to minimize the total time needed to perform all movements. They consider both incoming and outgoing containers and propose both constructive and meta-heuristics to solve the problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their paper, Legato et al (2009) apply both optimization and simulation techniques on yard operations and propose a model to evaluate the best policy for assigning yard cranes to yard blocks. Casey and Kozan (2012), present a heuristics and meta-heuristics based optimization model for multimodal container terminals, dealing with assigning containers to positions within the storage area, re-handling of containers and calculation of processing times to perform these actions.…”
Section: Theoretical Application Of Business Process Management In Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• yard design, including material handling equipment selection and storage yard layout (e.g., [3,4]); • storage space assignment to containers (e.g., [5,6]); • material handling equipment dispatching and routing to serve the storage and/or retrieval requests (e.g., [7,8]); • optimizing the reshuffling of containers (e.g., [9,10]).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%