2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation‐based switch allocation to improve energy losses and service restoration in radial electrical distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 2 -This step is similar to the reconfiguration problem solution. After determining candidates of system switches, the algorithm determines the best configuration of the DS using the identified two objectives mentioned in equations (4) and (8) including all logical and technical constraints. The system configuration, in this paper is determined using the GA.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Step 2 -This step is similar to the reconfiguration problem solution. After determining candidates of system switches, the algorithm determines the best configuration of the DS using the identified two objectives mentioned in equations (4) and (8) including all logical and technical constraints. The system configuration, in this paper is determined using the GA.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) To sectionalize radial distribution feeders, for the purpose of limiting outage durations by limiting the number of customers out of service during faults [2], (2) To tie more than one feeder for the purpose of creating open loop topologies to facilitate power restoration during contingencies [3], and (3) To reconfigure the DS for minimization of active power (and energy) losses in the DS during normal operations [4]. While the first and the second goals play a role only in improving the System Performance (SP), the third goal will impact the System Operational Flexibility (SOF) in addition to overall system financial performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, methods [22,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] consider optimal placement of switching devices using a single, weighted objective function. Approaches [22,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] combine switch investments and customer outage costs, whilst minimization of investments subject to maximized restored load is done in [47,48]; the disadvantages are similar as before. It is worth noting that the sophisticated optimization model in [49] offers a CI-CML improvement method that is close to reality; however it is limited to solving the network reconfiguration on a specific, non-general network due to model complexity.…”
Section: Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DG and capacitor locations were proposed for power losses reduction and ameliorating voltage profiles in distribution system [7]. In addition, switching devices allocation was analyzed in order to gain power loss reduction as well as service restoration [8]. Moreover, various methods were proposed in an area of DG units siting and sizing [9]- [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%