2019
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation and usefulness of quantitative analysis of 18F-florbetapir PET

Abstract: Objectives: This study investigates the usefulness of quantitative SUVR thresholds on sub types of typical (type A) and atypical (non-type A) positive (Aβ+) and negative (Aβ-) 18F-florbetapir scans and aims to optimise the thresholds. Methods: Clinical 18F-florbetapir scans (n = 100) were categorised by sub type and visual reads were performed independently by three trained readers. Inter-reader agreement and reader-to-reference agreement were measured. Optimal SUVR thresholds were derived by ROC analysis and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found thresholds of 0.19, 0.23 and 0.29 for BP ND , and thresholds of 1.28, 1.34 and 1.43 for SUVr. Literature has generated inconsistent findings with respect to amyloid thresholds, ranging from 1.08 to 1.34 for SUVr, with 1.10 being reported most frequently [12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][42][43][44][45]. The large variability indicates that thresholds may to some extent rely on methodology, image processing pipeline used and study sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found thresholds of 0.19, 0.23 and 0.29 for BP ND , and thresholds of 1.28, 1.34 and 1.43 for SUVr. Literature has generated inconsistent findings with respect to amyloid thresholds, ranging from 1.08 to 1.34 for SUVr, with 1.10 being reported most frequently [12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][42][43][44][45]. The large variability indicates that thresholds may to some extent rely on methodology, image processing pipeline used and study sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and FDG-PET images were selected for all subjects. Notably, among these participants, 26 NC and 32 SCD subjects were selected from the Tiantan Hospital (Capital Medical University; a subcenter of SILCODE project), and they additionally had amyloid-PET (Florbetapir F-18 [AV45]) images taken, in which 38.5% of the NC ( n = 10) and 37.5% of the SCD subjects ( n = 12) were classified as amyloid positivity according to a priori with the established cutoff of cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) > 1.18 [ 17 , 18 ]; the remaining subjects were all recruited from Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University (center of SILCODE project), and they did not undergo amyloid-PET scans.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For FDG-PET, the smoothed images for each subject were normalized to obtain the SUVR map using the cerebral cortex as a reference region. For amyloid-PET, the whole cerebellum was used as the reference region, and the whole cerebral cortex was used as the ROI [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole brain voxel-wise standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was normalized to the whole cerebellum, representing the mean cortical SUVR. For the dichotomy, amyloid-PET positivity (that is, participants who in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer’s continuum) was defined a priori with the established cutoff of >1.18 ( Fakhry-Darian et al, 2019 ). The results for each participant were confirmed by two senior radiologists who were blinded to any clinical information and made positive or negative judgments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%