2005
DOI: 10.3141/1924-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Land Use—Transport Strategies: Methodology and Application to European Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these will be affected by the scale and intensity with which a policy instrument is used; fare changes, for example, can vary in magnitude, by time of day and potentially by route and area. The number of possible policy combinations is thus very extensive, and our parallel work on policy optimisation (May et al, 2005a) has been developed to assist in their analysis.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these will be affected by the scale and intensity with which a policy instrument is used; fare changes, for example, can vary in magnitude, by time of day and potentially by route and area. The number of possible policy combinations is thus very extensive, and our parallel work on policy optimisation (May et al, 2005a) has been developed to assist in their analysis.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategic model MARS has been used to represent the Edinburgh region in the UK. The case study is described in more detail in May et al (2005a). The sensitivity approach adopted was as follows:-…”
Section: The Application Of Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Road user charging will be more effective if integrated with other policies [64]. Research on integrated strategies has demonstrated that road user charging is a key element of an effective strategy, and is best complemented by actions to promote public transport, to reallocate road space and to manage land use [35,41]. These measures are also likely to reduce the adverse impacts of urban road user charging on those travellers who are most disadvantaged by it, and increase its acceptability [42].…”
Section: Possible Objectives and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision of central funding may also serve to reduce some of the perceived local political risks although the delivery risks are then both locally and nationally significant. It is anticipated, both from the theory [23] and from the evidence above regarding the selection of solutions which match local goals, that authorities are most likely to bid when: 2 Reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Group, http://www.informaworld.com 3 It is also the case that authorities see obvious benchmark groups for themselves in different contexts (e.g. the core cities group (congestion), former mining towns (regeneration)) a) they think they have a chance of winning (and the costs of bidding are low enough to make the winning pay off substantial); and b) the funding supports activities that meet objectives they would wish to pursue.…”
Section: Pump Priming Of Innovative Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a local or regional scale there exists a range of policy choices which could be selected and a key dilemma facing these areas is which package of policies is feasible and will work best for them now and in the future [2]. In Europe, the Green Paper on Urban Mobility from 2007 suggests that 'European towns and cities are all different, but they face similar challenges and are trying to find common solutions' [3, p1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%