2004
DOI: 10.1155/2004/710924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Cantilever Dynamic Vibration Absorbers by Timoshenko Beam Theory

Abstract: Professor Bruno Piombo has shown us that the passion for the research and for teaching is a never-ending gift.Abstract. A double-ended cantilever beam as a distributed parameter dynamic vibration absorber has been applied to a singledegree-of-freedom system subjected to harmonic forces.In this investigation, the beam has been analyzed under the well known model of Timoshenko and the computation of best parameters is based on the Chebyshev's optimality criterion. This is somewhat novel in the field since:-the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there are very few studies which models the primary and/or the absorber system as a continuous model for complicated models. Cavacece and Vita [28] have investigated double-ended cantilever beam as a distributed parameter dynamic vibration absorber. However, in their study the primary system has been considered simply as a single degree-of-freedom system which is subjected to harmonic forces and the absorber has been assumed as a cantilever beam without tip masses.…”
Section: Experimental Observations and Numerical Investigations With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are very few studies which models the primary and/or the absorber system as a continuous model for complicated models. Cavacece and Vita [28] have investigated double-ended cantilever beam as a distributed parameter dynamic vibration absorber. However, in their study the primary system has been considered simply as a single degree-of-freedom system which is subjected to harmonic forces and the absorber has been assumed as a cantilever beam without tip masses.…”
Section: Experimental Observations and Numerical Investigations With mentioning
confidence: 99%