1996
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/83.2.484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal block designs for diallel crosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the theory of optimal diallel cross designs is based on standard linear model assumptions where the general combining ability effects are taken as fixed and the primary interest lies in comparing the lines with respect to their general combining ability effects. Under such a model, among others, (Gupta and Kageyama 1994, Dey and Midha 1996, Mukerjee 1997, Das et al 1998, Ghosh and Das 2004) have characterized and obtained optimal completely randomised designs and incomplete block designs for diallel crosses. Jakubec et al, (1987) most importantly developed and evaluated three models for the analysis of complete (full) diallel crosses in animal breeding, derived from (Gardner and Eberhart 1966), (Harvey 1960) and (Griffing 1956) models, which is advantageous when the parental population is small and most efficient as it gives detailed information about crossbreeding parameters.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Effects From Diallel Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the theory of optimal diallel cross designs is based on standard linear model assumptions where the general combining ability effects are taken as fixed and the primary interest lies in comparing the lines with respect to their general combining ability effects. Under such a model, among others, (Gupta and Kageyama 1994, Dey and Midha 1996, Mukerjee 1997, Das et al 1998, Ghosh and Das 2004) have characterized and obtained optimal completely randomised designs and incomplete block designs for diallel crosses. Jakubec et al, (1987) most importantly developed and evaluated three models for the analysis of complete (full) diallel crosses in animal breeding, derived from (Gardner and Eberhart 1966), (Harvey 1960) and (Griffing 1956) models, which is advantageous when the parental population is small and most efficient as it gives detailed information about crossbreeding parameters.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Effects From Diallel Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the fixed effects model, Gupta & Kageyama (1994), Dey & Midha (1996) and Das, Dey & Dean (1998) have obtained universally optimal (and hence E-optimal) diallel cross designs. It thus follows that their designs are D l -optimal under our setup.…”
Section: Optimal Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the theory of optimal diallel cross designs is based on standard linear model assumptions where the general combining ability effects are taken as fixed and the primary interest lies in comparing the lines with respect to their general combining ability effects. Under such a model, among others, Gupta & Kageyama (1994), Dey & Midha (1996), Mukerjee (1997), Das, Dey & Dean (1998) and Das, Dean & Gupta (1998) have characterised and obtained optimal completely randomised designs and incomplete block designs for diallel crosses. In many practical situations, the fixed effects assumption may not be tenable when one is studying only a sample of inbred lines from a possibly large hypothetical population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta and Kageyama [5], Dey and Midha [6], and Das et al [7] investigated the issue of optimality of complete diallel crosses. When p, is large, or reciprocal crosses are similar to direct crosses it becomes impractical to carry out an experiment using a complete diallel cross design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%