2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2003.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal diallel cross designs for the interval estimation of heredity

Abstract: SummaryThe results on optimal diallel cross designs are based on standard linear model assumptions where the general combining ability effects are taken as fixed. In many practical situations, this assumption may not be tenable since often one studies only a sample of inbred lines from a possibly large hypothetical population. A random effects model is proposed in this paper that allows us to obtain an interval estimate of a ratio of the variance components. We address the issue of optimal designs by consideri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method will be useful in identifying the most productive genetic combinations that will be viable in the natural habitat of the breeds, as it will have more impact on pig production. This is necessary as Assis et al, (2004);Dickerson, (1993); Ghosh and Das, (2004) agree that diallel cross is an effective method to evaluate the genetic and heterotic potential of the breeds or lines involved in genetic improvement programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method will be useful in identifying the most productive genetic combinations that will be viable in the natural habitat of the breeds, as it will have more impact on pig production. This is necessary as Assis et al, (2004);Dickerson, (1993); Ghosh and Das, (2004) agree that diallel cross is an effective method to evaluate the genetic and heterotic potential of the breeds or lines involved in genetic improvement programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the theory of optimal diallel cross designs is based on standard linear model assumptions where the general combining ability effects are taken as fixed and the primary interest lies in comparing the lines with respect to their general combining ability effects. Under such a model, among others, (Gupta and Kageyama 1994, Dey and Midha 1996, Mukerjee 1997, Das et al 1998, Ghosh and Das 2004) have characterized and obtained optimal completely randomised designs and incomplete block designs for diallel crosses. Jakubec et al, (1987) most importantly developed and evaluated three models for the analysis of complete (full) diallel crosses in animal breeding, derived from (Gardner and Eberhart 1966), (Harvey 1960) and (Griffing 1956) models, which is advantageous when the parental population is small and most efficient as it gives detailed information about crossbreeding parameters.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Effects From Diallel Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and has maximum trace, thus proving that the series of designs d e (m, n) are asymptotically universally optimal under fixed effects. Therefore, these designs should also have high efficiencies in the context of A, D, E-optimality under fixed effects model and L-optimality under random effects model (Ghosh and Das (2003b)). …”
Section: Thus It Is Enough To Show That Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s ij = specific heterosis between lines i and j. Dickerson (1993), Ghosh and Das (2004) and Lessa de Assis and Carneiro (2004) agree that the diallel cross is an effective method to evaluate the genetic and heterotic potential of the breeds or lines involved in genetic programs.…”
Section: Diallel Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%