Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture 1990
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-04767-8.50007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Properties of Vegetation Canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
16

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
62
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Their strong relationship with crop water status is potentially due to the fact that water stress manifests as an increase in green reflectance as discussed by Zygielbaum et al [67]. Nevertheless, other morphological responses (e.g., leaf angle distribution, canopy geometry) as well as phenological and physiological adaptive mechanisms to stress conditions can occur and have varied effects among species [68][69][70], which may introduce some confounding effects on the response of these structural-oriented VIs. Additionally, factors like leaf age can also influence the spectral response thus impacting these VIs responses [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their strong relationship with crop water status is potentially due to the fact that water stress manifests as an increase in green reflectance as discussed by Zygielbaum et al [67]. Nevertheless, other morphological responses (e.g., leaf angle distribution, canopy geometry) as well as phenological and physiological adaptive mechanisms to stress conditions can occur and have varied effects among species [68][69][70], which may introduce some confounding effects on the response of these structural-oriented VIs. Additionally, factors like leaf age can also influence the spectral response thus impacting these VIs responses [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, other morphological responses (e.g., leaf angle distribution, canopy geometry) as well as phenological and physiological adaptive mechanisms to stress conditions can occur and have varied effects among species [68][69][70], which may introduce some confounding effects on the response of these structural-oriented VIs. Additionally, factors like leaf age can also influence the spectral response thus impacting these VIs responses [70]. Contrarily, PRI is a stress/physiology-oriented hyperspectral VI [49] designed for measuring subtle decreases of reflectance around 531 nm due to changes in the xanthophyll cycle pigment activity resulting from stress conditions, including water stress conditions [32,34,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have shown that canopy reflectance within the red (600-710 nm) and near infra-red (750-900 nm) wavelengths were correlated with disease severity estimates. In the visible range reflectance is considered to be influenced by leaf pigments such as chlorophyll and in the near-infrared range reflectance is affected by changes in the anatomical structure of leaves [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation may arise from the environmental growth conditions, varying anatomy, morphology and pigmentation and diverse species differences. Such factors can dramatically influence the visible reflectance, and PRI (Guyot, 1990).…”
Section: Canopy Pri and Photosynthetic Luementioning
confidence: 99%