The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00167-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of photosynthetic-light-use efficiency of boreal forest

Abstract: Using a helicopter-mounted portable spectroradiometer and continuous eddy covariance data we were able to evaluate the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) as an indicator of canopy photosynthetic light-use efficiency (LUE) in four boreal forest species during the Boreal Ecosystem Atmosphere experiment (BOREAS). PRI was calculated from narrow waveband reflectance data and correlated with LUE calculated from eddy covariance data. Significant linear correlations were found between PRI and LUE when the four spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
128
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…involved, include near surface observations using transect measurements , permanently established tower based observations of forest canopies (Leuning et al, 2006;Hilker et al, 2007), and airborne measurements (Nichol et al, 2000;Chen and Vierling, 2006;Rahman et al, 2001). A first spaceborne assessment of was introduced by Drolet et al (2005), successfully using backscatter reflectance data from MODIS Aqua over the Canadian boreal forest with a spatial resolution of 1 km 2 .…”
Section: Direct Estimation Of Photosynthetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…involved, include near surface observations using transect measurements , permanently established tower based observations of forest canopies (Leuning et al, 2006;Hilker et al, 2007), and airborne measurements (Nichol et al, 2000;Chen and Vierling, 2006;Rahman et al, 2001). A first spaceborne assessment of was introduced by Drolet et al (2005), successfully using backscatter reflectance data from MODIS Aqua over the Canadian boreal forest with a spatial resolution of 1 km 2 .…”
Section: Direct Estimation Of Photosynthetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPP can be determined from EC data by adding estimates of ecosystem respiration (R) to measured NEP values, and can be obtained from additional measurements of f PAR and PAR using radiation sensors above and below the canopy (Humphreys et al, 2006). Remotely sensed estimates of stand level GPP have been correlated with EC flux data from ground based (Cheng et al, 2006;Sims et al, 2006), tower based (Filella et al, 1996;Stylinski et al, 2002), airborne (Nichol et al, 2000; and spaceborne platforms Drolet et al, 2005;Coops et al, 2007). Also, to bridge the spatial gap existing between near surface and airborne remote sensing platforms, Chen and Vierling (2006) tested a tethered balloon mounted platform to evaluate canopy reflectance of a grassland conifer forest ecotone.…”
Section: Validation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connections between PRI and other photosynthetic parameters, including a quantum yield of photosystem II (∆F/F m ') [38,41,42,[45][46][47][48][49], photosynthetic light use efficiency (LUE) [3,48,[50][51][52][53][54][55], and net CO 2 uptake [47,[56][57][58][59], are actively being investigated. However, the results of these different works vary considerably, e.g., the linear correlation coefficients between PRI and NPQ can range from −0.90 [38,49,60] to +0.86 [41] in different investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For vegetated surfaces the ability to link a variety of reflectance indices [1,10,11,19,37,39,40,46,58] to, for example, chlorophyll and other pigment concentrations, light use efficiency, leaf water content, and leaf area index ensures the continued pursuit of improved sensors and signal extraction methods [5,20,26,30,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracted relationships often rely on 'signature' bands of reflectance, first-or second-order derivatives of reflectance and higher moments [19,37,39,45,46,55,58,60,64]. Endmember classification [33] and factor spectra [11] also assist in identifying relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%