1995
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(95)00039-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical detection of ultrasound on rough surfaces by a phase-conjugate method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the TWM approach, the DPCMprocessed optical beams can be made planar, and free of phase and intensity variations which, in principle, can improve the signal-to-noise by an additional 3 dB. This DPCM scheme was recently demonstrated by several groups independently, using either heterodyne [12,13] or homodyne [14] detection techniques, with similar qualitative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, in contrast to the TWM approach, the DPCMprocessed optical beams can be made planar, and free of phase and intensity variations which, in principle, can improve the signal-to-noise by an additional 3 dB. This DPCM scheme was recently demonstrated by several groups independently, using either heterodyne [12,13] or homodyne [14] detection techniques, with similar qualitative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This was one of the reasons for considering active or adaptive holographic interferometers. Among different possibilities, double phase conjugation, [7][8][9] non-steady-state photoelectromotive force, 10 and photorefractive beam combiner, [11][12][13][14][15][16] we analyzed and developed this later technique that seems to us as the most promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, one can categorize this detector as an example of a more general class of so-called "adaptive photodetectors," which provide coherent detection capabilities in the face of dynamic optical distortions of the interacting beams. We note that other classes of adaptive photodetectors have been demonstrated for use as LBU receiver elements, including double-pumped phase-conjugate mirrors [11,12,13] and photorefractive two-wave mixing schemes [14,15], both of which also employ nonlinear optical techniques to compensate for single-pass optical phase noise, such as speckle and beam wander. These approaches differ from the photo-emf scheme, in that they perform only the beam clean-up and/or wavefront-matching operations and, therefore, require a subsequent coherent-detection stage.…”
Section: The Photo-emf Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%