2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6tc01276k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical analysis of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells

Abstract: A detailed optical analysis of the absorption distribution, parasitic absorption and reflection losses in various semi-transparent perovskite solar cell structures and their impact on tandem cell efficiencies is reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,31 Parasitic absorption of short wavelength light also exists in the ITO/MoO 3 stack, which is also the most commonly used transparent conductive stack for the top of the semi-transparent perovskite in a tandem. 17,32 The thin MoO 3 protects the perovskite cell from sputter damage from the deposition of ITO, which is responsible for electrical conduction. Absorption in the ITO/MoO 3 /HTM stack hinders the effectiveness of the use of the high bandgap perovskite.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,31 Parasitic absorption of short wavelength light also exists in the ITO/MoO 3 stack, which is also the most commonly used transparent conductive stack for the top of the semi-transparent perovskite in a tandem. 17,32 The thin MoO 3 protects the perovskite cell from sputter damage from the deposition of ITO, which is responsible for electrical conduction. Absorption in the ITO/MoO 3 /HTM stack hinders the effectiveness of the use of the high bandgap perovskite.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized thickness of the perovskite layer varies depending on the different tandem structures. For example, the change of the top transparent electrode from ITO to DMD (MoO x /Au/MoO x multi‐layer transparent electrode) could result in a thinner optimized thickness for the perovskite layer to meet the current match of the top and bottom sub‐cells in the tandem model of Jiang et al The change of reflection or conductivity of the top electrode, as well as the carrier recombination behaviors in the solar device, could also affect the optimized perovskite thickness …”
Section: Optical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to detailed balance (Shockley-Queisser limit) calculations, tandem solar cells with bandgaps DOI: 10.1002/adts.201800030 of 1.7 and 1.1 eV for the top and bottom solar cell, respectively, can even achieve energy conversion efficiency exceeding 40%. [12,13] Amorphous silicon material with a bandgap of 1.7 eV exhibits an almost perfect bandgap for the realization of highly efficient tandem solar cells. So far, perovskite/crystalline silicon tandem solar cells in two-terminal and four-terminal configurations have reached energy conversion efficiencies of 23.6% and 26.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%