2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ee00689j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large area efficient interface layer free monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell with over 20% efficiency

Abstract: aMonolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells show great promise for further efficiency enhancement for current silicon photovoltaic technology. In general, an interface (tunnelling or recombination) layer is usually required for electrical contact between the top and the bottom cells, which incurs higher fabrication costs and parasitic absorption. Most of the monolithic perovskite/Si tandem cells demonstrated use a hetero-junction silicon (Si) solar cell as the bottom cell, on small areas only. This work … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
186
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] With the improvement in WBG perovskite cells, the efficiencies of perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells have increased from 13.7% in 2015 to 23.6% in 2017, and to 25.2% in June 2018 (Table S1). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Optical loss, fill factor loss, current mismatch, and open-circuit voltage (V oc ) deficit (E g /q À V oc ) are the main issues currently limiting the PCE of these perovskite/silicon tandem devices. Several technologies have been explored to reduce the reflection-and parasitic-absorption-induced optical losses, such as antireflective foils, 12 nanocrystalline silicon recombination junctions, 13 silicon-nanoparticle rear reflectors, 11 and double-side-textured silicon bottom cells.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] With the improvement in WBG perovskite cells, the efficiencies of perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells have increased from 13.7% in 2015 to 23.6% in 2017, and to 25.2% in June 2018 (Table S1). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Optical loss, fill factor loss, current mismatch, and open-circuit voltage (V oc ) deficit (E g /q À V oc ) are the main issues currently limiting the PCE of these perovskite/silicon tandem devices. Several technologies have been explored to reduce the reflection-and parasitic-absorption-induced optical losses, such as antireflective foils, 12 nanocrystalline silicon recombination junctions, 13 silicon-nanoparticle rear reflectors, 11 and double-side-textured silicon bottom cells.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their solution processability, bandgap tunability, and high photovoltaic performance without epitaxial growth that requires lattice matching, organicinorganic halide perovskites have distinguished themselves from other photovoltaic semiconductors as suitable tandem partners for silicon. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Recent…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to protect the perovskite top‐cell upon post‐annealing, organic PEIE/PCBM bi‐layer instead of conventional TiO 2 was utilized as the ETL. In June 2018, Zheng et al achieved an efficient interface‐layer‐free monolithic perovskite/homo‐junction‐silicon tandem solar cell on large areas (4 and 16 cm 2 ), with a low‐temperature processed SnO 2 serving as both the ETL and recombination layers. The CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 ‐Si tandem device on 4 cm 2 area showed an efficiency of 21.0%, with V OC of 1.68 V, J SC of 16.1 mA cm −2 and a high FF of 78%.…”
Section: Current Research Trends In Tandem Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballif and coworkers reported a 12.96 cm 2 monolithic tandem cell with a steady‐state PCE of 18%, in which a nanocrystalline silicon was employed as the recombination layer instead of transparent conductive oxides to mitigate the optical losses and shunt resistance . Ho‐Baillie et al demonstrated a 16 cm 2 monolithic tandem cell without the use of an additional interface/recombination layer achieving a PCE of 17.1%, and just in few months they pushed the efficiency of 16 cm 2 tandem device to 21.8% by employing a new metal grid design, a mixed perovskite absorber, and a textured rear surface . Despite the spectacular development of monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem cell, the area of the currently largest 16 cm 2 cell lags far behind the size of silicon solar cells of over 200 cm 2 (6 in.).…”
Section: Upscaling Of Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%