Abstract:For high technology firms that depend on foreign markets from the outset, identifying opportunities is a matter not only of business development but of survival. This study contributes to the opportunity recognition literature by exploring the paths taken by these international entrepreneurs to find opportunities in foreign markets. Moreover, it examines the paths of firms at different lifecycle stages. Based on indepth interviews with 5 start-ups and 5 growth firms in Canada specialized in photonics, this res… Show more
“…Empirical evidence exists for Personality Traits in the TAS process, as some are significantly correlated with entrepreneurial behaviour (Rauch and Frese, 2007). In the context of ideation, activeness (Veilleux et al 2018), creativity, optimism, and self-efficacy (Ardichvili et al 2003) First introduced by Kirzner (1997), the term of Entrepreneurial Alertness gathered popularity in terms of application identification, enabling the entrepreneur to perceive opportunities without actively searching (Baron, 2006). It can be strengthened by personality traits like creativity and optimism (Ardichvili et al 2003) and is seen as a key determinant of the ideation process (Garcia-Cabrera and Garcia-Soto, 2009;Lim and Lee, 2019).…”
Section: Influential Factors and Challenges In The Tas Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, studies explored the theoretical underpinnings in practical settings, testing the derived factors and contributions in the business environment (Wohlfeil and Terzidis, 2015;Okhli et al 2019). Associated research topics, like methods to support the identification and selection process of applications for technology, have been covered by e.g., Hartelt et al (2015) and Veilleux et al (2018). Few authors address the development and testing of practical approaches to identify and select applications for new technologies, despite the continuous interest in tackling the challenge of TP innovations leading back to Roberson and Weijo (1988), being followed by various studies until today (Moncada-Peternò-Castello et al 2003;Bianchi et al 2010;Terzidis and Vogel, 2018).…”
Technological innovations are crucial for a country’s economic growth as they often have radical innovation potential. Although recognized as a key role in the innovation process, lots of technologies remain unexploited. University spin-offs (USOs) have the potential to transfer technologies into technological innovations. Often though, in universities there is a lack of consideration of potential implementation right from the start. The so-called fuzzyfront end (FFE) stage is crucial for successful innovation, as no commercialization can be achieved without the identification of a suitable application. This represents a critical hurdle, as of to date appropriate approaches for a successful systematic identification and validation of technology applications are missing. Furthermore, most investigating studies rely on data from spin-offs that are already operating successfully on the market and have therefore survived the critical initial stages of development, without highlighting the FFE of their process. This fact makes the pre-development activity of opportunity recognition appear to be a scientifically neglected topic.
In this research a mixed-method approach is conducted to investigate the critical hurdles in the technology application selection (TAS) process of technologies, consisting of an extended literature review, completed by interviews with stakeholder involved in the USOs ecosystem. Striving to uncover the black box of the FFE, the study aims to specify and operationalize requirements for application identification of technologies. These findings are of relevance for researchers and practitioners which like to facilitate the exploration of potential technological innovation.
“…Empirical evidence exists for Personality Traits in the TAS process, as some are significantly correlated with entrepreneurial behaviour (Rauch and Frese, 2007). In the context of ideation, activeness (Veilleux et al 2018), creativity, optimism, and self-efficacy (Ardichvili et al 2003) First introduced by Kirzner (1997), the term of Entrepreneurial Alertness gathered popularity in terms of application identification, enabling the entrepreneur to perceive opportunities without actively searching (Baron, 2006). It can be strengthened by personality traits like creativity and optimism (Ardichvili et al 2003) and is seen as a key determinant of the ideation process (Garcia-Cabrera and Garcia-Soto, 2009;Lim and Lee, 2019).…”
Section: Influential Factors and Challenges In The Tas Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, studies explored the theoretical underpinnings in practical settings, testing the derived factors and contributions in the business environment (Wohlfeil and Terzidis, 2015;Okhli et al 2019). Associated research topics, like methods to support the identification and selection process of applications for technology, have been covered by e.g., Hartelt et al (2015) and Veilleux et al (2018). Few authors address the development and testing of practical approaches to identify and select applications for new technologies, despite the continuous interest in tackling the challenge of TP innovations leading back to Roberson and Weijo (1988), being followed by various studies until today (Moncada-Peternò-Castello et al 2003;Bianchi et al 2010;Terzidis and Vogel, 2018).…”
Technological innovations are crucial for a country’s economic growth as they often have radical innovation potential. Although recognized as a key role in the innovation process, lots of technologies remain unexploited. University spin-offs (USOs) have the potential to transfer technologies into technological innovations. Often though, in universities there is a lack of consideration of potential implementation right from the start. The so-called fuzzyfront end (FFE) stage is crucial for successful innovation, as no commercialization can be achieved without the identification of a suitable application. This represents a critical hurdle, as of to date appropriate approaches for a successful systematic identification and validation of technology applications are missing. Furthermore, most investigating studies rely on data from spin-offs that are already operating successfully on the market and have therefore survived the critical initial stages of development, without highlighting the FFE of their process. This fact makes the pre-development activity of opportunity recognition appear to be a scientifically neglected topic.
In this research a mixed-method approach is conducted to investigate the critical hurdles in the technology application selection (TAS) process of technologies, consisting of an extended literature review, completed by interviews with stakeholder involved in the USOs ecosystem. Striving to uncover the black box of the FFE, the study aims to specify and operationalize requirements for application identification of technologies. These findings are of relevance for researchers and practitioners which like to facilitate the exploration of potential technological innovation.
“…Seguindo essa abordagem, as pesquisas empíricas desse quadrante analisam as seguintes características do empreendedor, que permitem a descoberta de oportunidades internacionais: o estado de alerta (Rezvani et al, 2019); a capacidade dinâmica de gestão (Karra et al, 2008 A descoberta das oportunidades internacionais ainda foi estudada com base na influência: da aprendizagem (Lee e Williams, 2007;Kauppinen e Juho, 2012;Fayena et al, 2020); da obtenção de conhecimento (Eerme e Nummela, 2019); da abordagem de effectuation (Uthamaputhran, 2018); e, de maneira mais genérica, dos determinantes do processo de sua identificação (Angeli e Grimaldi, 2010;Caiazza, 2014;Urban e Willard, 2017;Veilleux et al, 2018). Além disso, foram desenvolvidos um modelo (Pearson et al, 2010) e uma escala (Mostafiz et al, 2019) para o auxílio nesse processo.…”
Purpose/Objective: This article aims to conduct a bibliometric study in order to analyze how the literature on international opportunities has addressed the issues surrounding its identification and origin. Method: A matrix was elaborated considering two fundamental aspects in the discussions on the theme: (1) how international opportunities are identified: created or discovered; and (2) the origin of the international opportunity: internal or external. Then, a bibliometric study was carried out, with an adaptation of the steps proposed by Ellegaard and Wallin (2015). The selected articles were classified in the proposed matrix. Originality/Relevance: This article innovates by developing an analytical tool that allows, through bibliometric study, the perception of how the literature on international opportunities has focused on some aspects and neglected others that could be complementary in the analysis, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomena and closer to reality. Results: The literature has focused on opportunities discovered by an internal source of the company, such as the ability of managers to identify international opportunities; and neglected the opportunities created, mainly by an internal source, such as in processes of effectuation. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The contributions of this study reside, therefore, in the development of a matrix that represents, in a simple and objective way, the core of the discussions in the area, which involves origin and identification of international opportunities. In addition, the bibliometric study indicates the paths that have been taken by scholars in the area, as well as allowing to discuss potential themes for future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.