2010
DOI: 10.1177/0738894210379475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and Presidential Uses of Force

Abstract: Political vulnerability is thought to influence the opportunities available to the US president to engage in uses of force abroad. Conventional theories linking economic misfortune and partisan opposition to presidential uses of force detail the incentives and constraints facing the president in decisions to use force. In contrast, these theories' strategic counterparts focus on the ability of US adversaries to respond to the president's vulnerability through either avoidance or exploitation. The behavior of U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(215 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars suggest presidents will “initiate disputes when economic conditions are poor” (Brulé, Marshall, and Prins , 505). Therefore, I also included interactive terms for unemployment and crisis as well as inflation and crisis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars suggest presidents will “initiate disputes when economic conditions are poor” (Brulé, Marshall, and Prins , 505). Therefore, I also included interactive terms for unemployment and crisis as well as inflation and crisis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach views a bad economy as a driving force incentivizing political leaders to initiate diversionary conflict as a way of proving their ability to lead the country (e.g. Bennett & Nordstrom, 2000; Brulé, Marshall & Prins, 2010; Fordham, 1998; Heldt, 1999; Solt, 2011). Of course, the leaders could also gain support by rebooting the economy, but they often feel unable to do so.…”
Section: An Economic Theory Of Diversionary Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic conflict avoidance theory has been widely analyzed at the international level (Brulé, Marshall, and Prins 2010;Clark 2003;Clark, Fordham, and Nordstrom 2016;Davies 2007;Enterline and Gleditsch 2000;Fordham 2005;Foster 2006;Keller and Foster 2016;Leeds and Davis 1997;Smith 1996Smith , 1998 but has been less frequently studied at the domestic level. Fordham (2005) posits that strategic conflict avoidance manifests in two behavioral modifications.…”
Section: Strategic Response Of Domestic Terror Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%