The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operationalising Dialogic Feedback to Develop Students’ Evaluative Judgement and Enactment of Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluative skills need to be gained through activities that immerse the learner "in the experience of giving, receiving, and interpreting feedback" https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.eb8dcf2b (Chong, 2021, p. 98). Interventions that involve co-construction of rubrics and assessment criteria (Ajjawi et al, 2018), that rely on exemplars Pitt, 2019), that offer opportunities for self-assessment (Boud et al, 2015) or peer review (Nicol et al, 2014) all help to develop evaluative judgement skills. This development may need to be a staged process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evaluative skills need to be gained through activities that immerse the learner "in the experience of giving, receiving, and interpreting feedback" https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.eb8dcf2b (Chong, 2021, p. 98). Interventions that involve co-construction of rubrics and assessment criteria (Ajjawi et al, 2018), that rely on exemplars Pitt, 2019), that offer opportunities for self-assessment (Boud et al, 2015) or peer review (Nicol et al, 2014) all help to develop evaluative judgement skills. This development may need to be a staged process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development may need to be a staged process. For example, exemplars of written work or performances can be used in the early stages of the learning process to build understanding of disciplinary specific notions of quality before building up to peer review of student work (Pitt, 2019). In respect of peer review, the real benefits come from undertaking the reviewing rather than being reviewed, as this allows students to gain more critical understanding of the relevant criteria which could then feed into the reviewer's own work (Nicol et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding that student action on the comments was less likely to be recognised as part of this process indicates that an important part of developing student and teacher feedback literacy is to broaden perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes, and to emphasise the importance of student action in facilitating the impact of feedback. More transformational approaches to responsibility-sharing, where the actions and responsibilities of students are brought to the fore, may be achieved through designing feedback processes in such a way that student action is built into the process (see Winstone and Carless 2019;Pitt 2019).…”
Section: Shifting Perceptions Of Responsibility-sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%