2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32160-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operation Regimes and Slower-is-Faster-Effect in the Control of Traffic Intersections

Abstract: Abstract. The efficiency of traffic flows in urban areas is known to crucially depend on signal operation. Here, elements of signal control are discussed, based on the minimization of overall travel times or vehicle queues. Interestingly, we find different operation regimes, some of which involve a "slower-is-faster effect", where a delayed switching reduces the average travel times. These operation regimes characterize different ways of organizing traffic flows in urban road networks. Besides the optimize-one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these temporary queues in FPC and BBC is proved beneficial for the total network throughput. 6 Thus, even if vehicles are restricted in the perimeter of the network, they are able to reach their destinations faster than in the no control case (''slower is faster'' effect, see Helbing and Mazloumian, 2009). Finally, the significantly lower number of vehicles within the network links (Vehicles Waiting Out) at the end of simulation indicates that the FPC control action does not create queues that spill back to upstream intersections at the boundary of neighborhood reservoirs.…”
Section: Simulation Results For Adaptive Drivers and Hysteresis Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these temporary queues in FPC and BBC is proved beneficial for the total network throughput. 6 Thus, even if vehicles are restricted in the perimeter of the network, they are able to reach their destinations faster than in the no control case (''slower is faster'' effect, see Helbing and Mazloumian, 2009). Finally, the significantly lower number of vehicles within the network links (Vehicles Waiting Out) at the end of simulation indicates that the FPC control action does not create queues that spill back to upstream intersections at the boundary of neighborhood reservoirs.…”
Section: Simulation Results For Adaptive Drivers and Hysteresis Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of PBSS over AAC also provides a demonstration on the slower-is-faster effect [7], a counterintuitive, but practically relevant effect in many queuing systems. A study on uniform arrival flows [7] suggests one possible reason for this effect, i.e., a road with a small utilization might wait to have enough vehicles in order to balance the efficiency loss caused by switching lights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study on uniform arrival flows [7] suggests one possible reason for this effect, i.e., a road with a small utilization might wait to have enough vehicles in order to balance the efficiency loss caused by switching lights. Our work is based on non-uniform arrival flows, which is more realistic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations