2007
DOI: 10.2175/193317707x256928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operating Experience of the First and Largest Low Level Nitrogen Removal Facility in Long Island Sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As limits of technology are approached, nitrogen reductions at point sources become increasingly more expensive. Costs of nitrogen removal at WWTPs in the Connecticut River Basin have been estimated to increase from $12 per pound at 8 mg/L total nitrogen discharged to $14 per pound at 5 mg/L total nitrogen discharged to $37 per pound at 3 mg/L total nitrogen discharged. , It is not unusual for costs to upgrade individual plants to a higher level of nitrogen reduction to run into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars …”
Section: Why Do We Need Shellfish Aquaculture? Current Challenges Fac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As limits of technology are approached, nitrogen reductions at point sources become increasingly more expensive. Costs of nitrogen removal at WWTPs in the Connecticut River Basin have been estimated to increase from $12 per pound at 8 mg/L total nitrogen discharged to $14 per pound at 5 mg/L total nitrogen discharged to $37 per pound at 3 mg/L total nitrogen discharged. , It is not unusual for costs to upgrade individual plants to a higher level of nitrogen reduction to run into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars …”
Section: Why Do We Need Shellfish Aquaculture? Current Challenges Fac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 It is not unusual for costs to upgrade individual plants to a higher level of nitrogen reduction to run into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. 34 Currently, advances in wastewater treatment processes for nitrogen removal result in effluent total nitrogen concentrations of 8 mg/L after biological nitrogen removal, and 3 mg/L after enhanced nitrogen removal. 35 It is worth noting that 3 mg/L of nitrogen in effluent still constitutes a substantial input of nitrogen in terms of potential phytoplankton and/or bacterial growth, equivalent to 200 μM total nitrogen.…”
Section: Current Challenges Facing Coastal and Estuarine Nitrogen Man...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilities are therefore able to meet the outcome of protecting Lake Mead (to which Las Vegas Wash discharges) while also limiting their chemical and energy usage, solids production, and overall expenditure. Outcome-focused Water Quality Trading has also been applied successfully, reducing costly plant upgrades that may not have resulted in a water quality benefit. , …”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome-focused Water Quality Trading has also been applied successfully, reducing costly plant upgrades that may not have resulted in a water quality benefit. 4,5 Finally, Prescriptive Codes and Standards Should Be Examined and Updated More Frequently to Adapt to and Allow Innovative Practices/Technologies. Codes and standards have their place to ensure that public health and the environment are protected and that any required infrastructure is implemented efficiently and effectively.…”
Section: ■ Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ikenberry et al (2002) reported secondary effluent DON values ranging from 1.0 mg/L to 1.5 mg/L at the Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility in Reno, Nevada. Brown et al (2007) reported an average N org concentration of 2.9 mg/L in the secondary effluent of a biological nutrient removal (BNR) plant in Stamford, Connecticut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%