The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/mobiq.2004.1331726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-driven adaptive sensor networks

Abstract: A wireless sensor network deployed in an area of interest is affected by variations in environmental conditions associated with that area. It must adapt to these variations in order to continue functioning as desired by the user. We present a novel, two-phase solution to the wireless sensor network adaptivity problem. In the first phase, nodes in the network, organized as clusters, execute an efficient algorithm to dynamically calibrate sensed data. Each node provides its current energy level and the state of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main problem today is that there are no standards or recommendations regarding the requirements for such equipment (electrical signals, communicational protocols and compatibility of software). There are merely some suggestions ( [35][36][37] [39] and CESN [40]) are merely descriptions of sensors, other like OntoSensor [41] are also capable of describing 'components', or like OOSTethys 'processes' in addition. Their conclusion gives the statement that a "combination of OntoSensor and the CSIRO ontology represents the current limit of expressive capability for semantic sensors" [38], but none of them is able to deal with the whole context of sensor descriptions.…”
Section: A Current Limitation In Remote Lab Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main problem today is that there are no standards or recommendations regarding the requirements for such equipment (electrical signals, communicational protocols and compatibility of software). There are merely some suggestions ( [35][36][37] [39] and CESN [40]) are merely descriptions of sensors, other like OntoSensor [41] are also capable of describing 'components', or like OOSTethys 'processes' in addition. Their conclusion gives the statement that a "combination of OntoSensor and the CSIRO ontology represents the current limit of expressive capability for semantic sensors" [38], but none of them is able to deal with the whole context of sensor descriptions.…”
Section: A Current Limitation In Remote Lab Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [Avancha, et al (2004)] ontologies are used for enabling an adaptive WSN, i.e. optimal sensor nodes operating modes.…”
Section: Semantic Web Based Architecture For Managing Hardware Heteromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the use of ontologies, a pioneer work defines an ontology for sensor nodes [11], which seeks to capture the most important sensor features to describe their functionalities and current state. Such work has similarities with ours in the sense that the contextual information is described by ontologies, with the goal of adapting the WSN behavior to different execution states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%