One‐year stability of the Measure of Processes of Care

Siebes, R. C.; Wijnroks, Lex; Schie, Petra E. M. van; Vermeer, A.; Gorter, Jan Willem

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00726.x

Cited by 14 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings are consistent with those reported by Dyke and colleagues (2006), G. A. King and colleagues (1996), Scope (2004), Siebes and colleagues (2007) and Raghavendra and colleagues (2007). Of particular interest is the universal finding relating to providing general information, which tends to suggest that early intervention services can do much more to meet families' information needs.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Information and professional support: key factors in the provision of family‐centred early childhood intervention services

Fordham

Gibson

Bowes

2011

Child

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Information and professional support: key factors in the provision of family‐centred early childhood intervention services

Fordham

Gibson

Bowes

2011

Child

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mostly, parents are involved in these meetings (Siebes et al . ). However, the frequency of these meetings can differ between settings, and these meetings can differ in the way parents are actively involved.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…In the other longitudinal study by Siebes et al . () describing the stability of the MPOC over 1 year, it appeared that the MPOC scores decreased, although the appreciation of the care remained stable. This underlines the fact that with the current results, no conclusions can be drawn about the appreciation of care or the objective quality of paediatric rehabilitation services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents' perceptions of the services provided to children with cerebral palsy in the transition from preschool rehabilitation to school‐based services

Alsem

Verhoef

Gorter

et al. 2016

Child

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The psychometric properties of these tools are well documented in a variety of pediatric settings and countries around the world and they have been translated into several languages (ie, French, Danish, Japanese, Arabic, Hebrew, and Portuguese) 17–19. A manual for use and interpretation of the MPOC is available by writing to CanChild (http://www.canchild.ca).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of the measures of processes of care for adults and service providers in rehabilitation settings

Bamm

Rosenbaum

Wilkins

et al. 2015

PROM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionIn recent years, client-centered care has been embraced as a new philosophy of care by many organizations around the world. Clinicians and researchers have identified the need for valid and reliable outcome measures that are easy to use to evaluate success of implementation of new concepts.ObjectiveThe current study was developed to complete adaptation and field testing of the companion patient-reported measures of processes of care for adults (MPOC-A) and the service provider self-reflection measure of processes of care for service providers working with adult clients (MPOC-SP(A)).DesignA validation studySettingsIn-patient rehabilitation facilities.Main outcome measuresMPOC-A and measure of processes of care for service providers working with adult clients (MPOC-SP(A)).ResultsThree hundred and eighty-four health care providers, 61 patients, and 16 family members completed the questionnaires. Good to excellent internal consistency (0.71–0.88 for health care professionals, 0.82–0.90 for patients, and 0.87–0.94 for family members), as well as moderate to good correlations between domains (0.40–0.78 for health care professionals and 0.52–0.84 for clients) supported internal reliability of the tools. Exploratory factor analysis of the MPOC-SP(A) responses supported the multidimensionality of the questionnaire.ConclusionMPOC-A and MPOC-SP(A) are valid and reliable tools to assess patient and service-provider accounts, respectively, of the extent to which they experience, or are able to provide, client-centered service. Research should now be undertaken to explore in more detail the relationships between client experience and provider reports of their own behavior.

show abstract

One‐year stability of the Measure of Processes of Care

Abstract: The MPOC has a moderate 1-year stability. However, because of its tendency to score lower when repeated after 1 year, its use as an evaluative follow-up instrument to assess the effectiveness of a programme intervention is restricted.

Cited by 14 publications

References 30 publications

Information and professional support: key factors in the provision of family‐centred early childhood intervention services

Information and professional support: key factors in the provision of family‐centred early childhood intervention services

Parents' perceptions of the services provided to children with cerebral palsy in the transition from preschool rehabilitation to school‐based services

Performance of the measures of processes of care for adults and service providers in rehabilitation settings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About