2002
DOI: 10.15807/jorsj.45.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Vargas's Proof of Consistency Test for 3 × 3 Comparison Matrices in Ahp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rule of thumb, a CR value of less than 0.1 or 10% is considered sensible. If the CR value is between 10% and 20%, it is considered reasonable [70][71][72]. However, any CR value more than 20% should not be accepted and requires re-evaluation.…”
Section: Ahp Aggregation Methods and Consistency Judgement Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule of thumb, a CR value of less than 0.1 or 10% is considered sensible. If the CR value is between 10% and 20%, it is considered reasonable [70][71][72]. However, any CR value more than 20% should not be accepted and requires re-evaluation.…”
Section: Ahp Aggregation Methods and Consistency Judgement Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's value has been estimated by calculating the total loss through opportunity cost at LSL and USL, in each case. In multi criteria decision making (AHP, ANP), an intuitive judgmental error upto 10 percent is acceptable (Chen et al, 2002;Saaty, 2008). The campus interviews also involve intuitive judgments based on the recruitment criteria.…”
Section: Formation Of Limit Supermatrixmentioning
confidence: 99%