2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of different constitutive models in data assimilation for slope stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate foundation settlement, various mathematical models are used. Let us consider two key models: the linear elastic-perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model [28,29] and the Hardening Soil (HS) model [30][31][32].…”
Section: Soil Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To calculate foundation settlement, various mathematical models are used. Let us consider two key models: the linear elastic-perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model [28,29] and the Hardening Soil (HS) model [30][31][32].…”
Section: Soil Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major disadvantage of the MC model is the invariance of the deformation modulus over the entire stress range. The relationship between stresses and strains in the MC model is described by Hooke's law [28,29]:…”
Section: Soil Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mohr-Coulomb model is the most preferred model to simulate backfill materials, as it is simple to use. Moreover, it efficiently captures the stress-dependent failure conditions (Mohsan et al, 2021). However, it is not capable of capturing the hardening before failure, stress-dependent stiffness and nonlinear elasticity.…”
Section: Effect Of Materials Models On Wall Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a. The modified Mohr-Coulomb model, otherwise known as the hardening soil model (hereinafter referred to as the MCC model) [12][13][14][15], allows you to separately specify the unloading elastic modulus E ur , which is assumed to be equal to three times the value of the secant elastic modulus by default: E ur = 3⋅E 50 , Fig. 5b.…”
Section: Vol 18 Issue 1 185-194mentioning
confidence: 99%