Investigating Obsolescence 1989
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511620997.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the social meaning of linguistic variability in language death situations: Variation in Newfoundland French

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As typical for a society with a dominant majority language and a minority language, the minority language is mostly used within the community, inside the family, and in informal contexts. The majority language, by contrast, is used in communication with the outside world, outside family, and in public domains (King, 1989:140, Tsunoda, 2006. As is typical in language endangerment situations marked by competition of the minority and majority languages for functional domains of use (e.g., King, 1989), the minority language in the Ganluo Ersu community is restricted to a limited set of domains.…”
Section: Functional Domains Of Language Use and Language Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As typical for a society with a dominant majority language and a minority language, the minority language is mostly used within the community, inside the family, and in informal contexts. The majority language, by contrast, is used in communication with the outside world, outside family, and in public domains (King, 1989:140, Tsunoda, 2006. As is typical in language endangerment situations marked by competition of the minority and majority languages for functional domains of use (e.g., King, 1989), the minority language in the Ganluo Ersu community is restricted to a limited set of domains.…”
Section: Functional Domains Of Language Use and Language Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority language, by contrast, is used in communication with the outside world, outside family, and in public domains (King, 1989:140, Tsunoda, 2006. As is typical in language endangerment situations marked by competition of the minority and majority languages for functional domains of use (e.g., King, 1989), the minority language in the Ganluo Ersu community is restricted to a limited set of domains. The majority language, on the other hand, dominates the education system and work in public domains and it is consciously or unconsciously associated for Ersu speakers with high social status and opportunities for socio-economic advancement.…”
Section: Functional Domains Of Language Use and Language Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender does not typically influence variation in situations of shift because rapid linguistic changes tend to erase the effect of social factors other than age (King 1989;Russo and Roberts 1999;Dorian 1989Dorian , 1981.…”
Section: The Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data was gathered through sociolinguistic French is endangered everywhere that it is spoken in the United States. If Franco-American were to follow the path of a great many other language varieties in decline, we would expect rapid linguistic change (e.g., structural simplification) to occur as the shift from French to English advances in New England (Rottet 2001;Russo and Roberts 1999;Mougeon and Béniak 1991;King 1989;Dorian 1981Dorian , 1989). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbi (1995), Austin (1986), Brenzinger (1997), Bunte and Kendall (1981), Campbell (1994), Campbell and Muntzel (1989), Clyne (1992), Cook (1989), Craig (1997), Dalton et al (1995), Denison (1977), Dorian (1973Dorian ( , 1978Dorian ( , 1981, Dressier (1972Dressier ( , 1981, Elmendorf (1981), Hamp (1989), Hill (1973Hill ( , 1978Hill ( , 1983Hill ( , 1989, Hill and Hill (1977, Huffines (1989), Jones (1998), Kapanga (1998), Kieffer (1977), Ruth King (1989), Maandi (1989), McGregor (2002), Miller (1971), Mithun (1989), Mougeon and Beniak (1989), Myers-Scotton (1998), Schmidt (1985aSchmidt ( , 1985b, Suwilai (1998), Allan R. Taylor (1989), Trudgill (1978), Tsitsipis (1989), Vakhtin (1998), and Voegelin and Voegelin (1977). Some of these studies are detailed, while others are sketchy.…”
Section: Introductory Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%