2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1813637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Si–SiO2 interface trap time constant distribution in metal-oxide-semiconductor transistors

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inInterface traps responsible for negative bias temperature instability in a nitrided submicron metal-oxidesemiconductor field effect transistor Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 103513 (2011); 10.1063/1.3559223Role of shallow Si / SiO 2 interface states on high frequency channel noise in n -channel metal-oxidesemiconductor field effect transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
8
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are extracted using (1) and (2). The trap profile has the same shape as that found in the literature using both calculation and measurement [22,37]. The Fig.…”
Section: Nbti-induced Border-trap Within Interfacial Sub-oxide Regionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…They are extracted using (1) and (2). The trap profile has the same shape as that found in the literature using both calculation and measurement [22,37]. The Fig.…”
Section: Nbti-induced Border-trap Within Interfacial Sub-oxide Regionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Hence, the first term in (19) represents the 3 dB reduction in trap noise power predicted by the stationary noise model. The second term in (19) is the surplus noise power reduction given by (21) (20), ii) PSD for the switching case based on the simplistic approach where a modulated version of the stationary model is used, with a frequency independent 3 dB reduction, iii) incorrect PSD for the switching case from Tian et al [12,Eq. (11)], with a larger than 3 dB but still frequency independent reduction, iv) correct PSD for the switching case as derived in (18).…”
Section: B Derivation Of Switched Trap Noise Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The capture processes are negligible outside inversion and accumulation, i.e., at voltage levels between V T and V FB [1]. 3) At maximum CP conditions, the integral of c n (t) over time equals the integral of c p (t) over time [15]. Using assumptions 1) and 2), the increase in capture rate during inversion may be written as…”
Section: Trap Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emission rates e n and e p are only dependent on the energy level of the trap with respect to the conduction band and valence band, respectively. No general closed-form solution can be found for the differential equation of (12); we will adopt a similar approach as in [15] in finding an expression for ∆f T from expression (12). In this approach, we make use of three basic assumptions.…”
Section: Trap Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation