2019
DOI: 10.1177/0146167218824359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Popularity of Agentic and Communal Narcissists: The Tit-for-Tat Hypothesis

Abstract: Among well-acquainted people, those high on agentic narcissism are less popular than those low on agentic narcissism. That popularity-difference figures prominently in the narcissism literature. But why are agentic narcissists less popular? We propose a novel answer―the tit-for-tat hypothesis. It states that agentic narcissists like other people less than non-narcissists do and that others reciprocate by liking agentic narcissists less in return. We also examine whether the tit-for-tat hypothesis generalizes t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(134 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present research, we identify distinct situational perceptions as mediators of the association between relationship satisfaction and agentic and antagonistic facets of grandiose narcissism. There are, however, several other attempts to parse the narcissistic personality construct (e.g., Crowe et al, 2019; Krizan & Herlache, 2018; Rogoza et al, 2019; Rose, 2002; Wright & Edershile, 2018), and we would like to encourage researchers to investigate communal aspects of grandiose narcissism characterized by overly positive self-views regarding one’s own communion (e.g., morality, prosociality, and interpersonal aptitude; Gebauer et al, 2012; Rentzsch & Gebauer, 2019) or vulnerable forms of narcissism such as hypersensitive narcissism, pathological narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder (Miller et al, 2018). Furthermore, our focus was on romantic relationships in Western societies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present research, we identify distinct situational perceptions as mediators of the association between relationship satisfaction and agentic and antagonistic facets of grandiose narcissism. There are, however, several other attempts to parse the narcissistic personality construct (e.g., Crowe et al, 2019; Krizan & Herlache, 2018; Rogoza et al, 2019; Rose, 2002; Wright & Edershile, 2018), and we would like to encourage researchers to investigate communal aspects of grandiose narcissism characterized by overly positive self-views regarding one’s own communion (e.g., morality, prosociality, and interpersonal aptitude; Gebauer et al, 2012; Rentzsch & Gebauer, 2019) or vulnerable forms of narcissism such as hypersensitive narcissism, pathological narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder (Miller et al, 2018). Furthermore, our focus was on romantic relationships in Western societies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported communal narcissism has been linked to higher arrogance and self-esteem (Gebauer et al, 2012 ; Zemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2017 ). Consequently, communal narcissists might be perceived as arrogant show-offs by others as well, and thus, as less likable (Rentzsch and Gebauer, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, at least in regard to narcissism, researchers are interested in its effects on being liked and popular (Czarna et al, 2016; Leckelt et al, 2019; Rentzsch & Gebauer, 2019). However, we believe this reflects only one side of the coin as it regards communal‐based relations, while nothing is known about agency‐based relations, which are qualitatively different (Abele & Wojciszke, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%