2010
DOI: 10.1159/000321054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Phonetics of Intensifying Emphasis in German

Abstract: This paper presents an exploratory study in the field of emphasis in German. It provides a comprehensive acoustic analysis for a type of emphasis that intensifies lexical meanings either positively or negatively. A speech corpus was recorded using an elicitation method adapted to yield natural-sounding, conversational, expressive speech under controlled conditions. Supporting the distinction between positive and negative intensification, two clearly different phonetic profiles emerged. These phonetic profiles … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instances in which the mispronounced word is completed before the onset of repair, as in sat soap … fat soap, tend to have a repair component with a low pitch and intensity prominence on the first vowel compared with the reparandum. Nooteboom does not consider the tempo of the repairs, but if we associate high pitch and intensity with relative emphasis, or hyper-articulation (Lindblom 1996, Smiljanić & Bradlow 2009, Niebuhr 2010, we would predict that 'early' repairs are more likely to be associated with temporal expansion following repair initiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instances in which the mispronounced word is completed before the onset of repair, as in sat soap … fat soap, tend to have a repair component with a low pitch and intensity prominence on the first vowel compared with the reparandum. Nooteboom does not consider the tempo of the repairs, but if we associate high pitch and intensity with relative emphasis, or hyper-articulation (Lindblom 1996, Smiljanić & Bradlow 2009, Niebuhr 2010, we would predict that 'early' repairs are more likely to be associated with temporal expansion following repair initiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the latter, plateau-shaped accents additionally mark the important piece of information as surprising, unexpected, stunning, incredible, indignant, undesired, or unintended. Such an expressive function would fit in with the larger accented-syllable and accented-vowel durations that were found for plateau-shaped accents (Baumann et al 2007;Kügler 2008;Breen et al 2010;Niebuhr 2010;Dorn and Ni Chasaide 2011;Görs and Niebuhr 2012). Further support for our conclusion comes from informal interviews with native speakers of Fering (taken by the first author in 2012).…”
Section: Question Iv: Pitch-accent Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To account for this complementary distribution, Trotzke and Turco (2015) suggest a clear-cut distinction between two types of emphasis (borrowing terms from the phonetic literature): 'emphasis for contrast' and 'emphasis for intensity' (first mentioned by Coleman 1914). While emphasis for contrast is typically associated with contrastive or corrective focus, emphasis for intensity, on the other hand, has to do with expressive and attitudinal evaluation (Niebuhr 2010). In syntactic terms, the emphasis projection responsible for those two interpretational options has two flavors: Emp [contrast] 0 and Emp [intensity] 0 , as depicted in (67).…”
Section: The Derivation Of Emphatic Fronting In Germanmentioning
confidence: 99%