2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5050000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the performance of venturi-porous pipe microbubble generator with inlet angle of 20° and outlet angle of 12°

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gordiychuk et al (2016) carried out an investigation on the factors influencing the size distribution of bubbles in a Venturi-type bubble generator, including air/water Reynolds number and volume fraction. They found that the bubble size was inversely proportional to the water flow rate and got increased with the increase in the volume fraction, which was confirmed by the subsequent works (Sun et al, 2017;Majid et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019aHuang et al, , 2019b. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Flow Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Gordiychuk et al (2016) carried out an investigation on the factors influencing the size distribution of bubbles in a Venturi-type bubble generator, including air/water Reynolds number and volume fraction. They found that the bubble size was inversely proportional to the water flow rate and got increased with the increase in the volume fraction, which was confirmed by the subsequent works (Sun et al, 2017;Majid et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019aHuang et al, , 2019b. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Flow Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It has also been shown that the diameter of the resulting microbubbles is heavily influenced by the gas and liquid flow rates. Majid et al (2018) observed an increase in bubble diameter from 700µm to 1250µm when gas flow rate was increased from 0.012 to 0.066 m 3 hr -1 . However, a decrease in diameter from 700µm to 400µm was observed when the liquid flow rate was increased from 1.8 to 4.8 L min -1 .…”
Section: Microbubble Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A series of holes allow for the automatic suction of gas. Common types of turbulent flow microbubble generators include the spherical body (Budhijanto et al, 2015;Deendarlianto et al, 2015;Kawahara et al, 2009;Sadatomi et al, 2005;Sadatomi et al, 2007), orifice (Sadatomi et al, 2012), Venturi (Baylar et al, 2007;Baylar et al, 2010;Rahman et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2018;Majid et al, 2018) and swirling flow (Terasaka et al, 2011;Li et al, 2013a;Li et al, 2013b;Levitsky et al, 2016;Yamashita et al, 2017;Hu and Xia, 2018;Xu et al, 2018). The advantage of these types of microbubble generator is that they have no moving parts and require no power.…”
Section: Microbubble Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013) [1], Juwana , dkk. (2019) [2], Majid, dkk.. (2018) [3], Mawarni, dkk. (2020) [4], Mawarn, dkk.. (2021) [5], Mawarni dkk.…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustakamentioning
confidence: 99%