1976
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1976.0172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interactions between large-scale structure and fine-grained turbulence in a free shear flow I. The development of temporal interactions in the mean

Abstract: In this problem a mean turbulent shear layer originally exists, homogeneous in the streamwise direction, formed perhaps by previous instabilities, but in equilibrium with the fine-grained turbulence. At a given time, a large eddy of a fixed horizontal wavenumber is initiated. We study the subsequent time development of the non-equilibrium interactions between the three components of flow as they adjust towards ultimate simultaneous equilibrium, using the integrated energy-balance conservation equations to deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of CS under the influence of these effects was tackled by Liu & Merkine (1976) and Alper & Liu (1978), who adapted the energy method based on the so-called 'shape assumptions': (a) the mean flow assumes a given self-similar shape but with its thickness evolving; (b) CS retains the shape of the eigenfunction of the linear stability problem; (c) the mean Reynolds stresses take a presumed shape, while the phase-averaged Reynolds stresses, which account for the effect of fine-scale turbulence on CS, were modelled with the aid of the transport equations. From the transversely integrated kinetic energy equations for the mean flow, CS and small-scale turbulence, a coupled system governing the shear-layer thickness, the amplitude of CS and the turbu-lence energy, was derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of CS under the influence of these effects was tackled by Liu & Merkine (1976) and Alper & Liu (1978), who adapted the energy method based on the so-called 'shape assumptions': (a) the mean flow assumes a given self-similar shape but with its thickness evolving; (b) CS retains the shape of the eigenfunction of the linear stability problem; (c) the mean Reynolds stresses take a presumed shape, while the phase-averaged Reynolds stresses, which account for the effect of fine-scale turbulence on CS, were modelled with the aid of the transport equations. From the transversely integrated kinetic energy equations for the mean flow, CS and small-scale turbulence, a coupled system governing the shear-layer thickness, the amplitude of CS and the turbu-lence energy, was derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%