1996
DOI: 10.1029/95wr03404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Incorporation of Drains into Three‐Dimensional Variably Saturated Groundwater Flow Models

Abstract: Subsurface drains are important features in many problems involving shallow groundwater flow and have generally been represented in two-dimensional numerical models by specifying hydraulic head or fluid flux at one or more nodes in the computational grid. Here we describe a new approach for representing drains in threedimensional variably saturated flow models. The method is based on a one-dimensional flow equation for the drain which is analogous to a one-dimensional open-channel flow equation; the numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K(h) is the tile drain conductivity and is be approximated by assuming shallow laminar flow: where μ is the fluid viscosity, ρ is the fluid density, and g is the gravitational acceleration constant. We refer to MacQuarrie and Sudicky [1996] for more details on the numerical implementation of tile drain flow in the model code, a verification of the approach, and some illustrative examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K(h) is the tile drain conductivity and is be approximated by assuming shallow laminar flow: where μ is the fluid viscosity, ρ is the fluid density, and g is the gravitational acceleration constant. We refer to MacQuarrie and Sudicky [1996] for more details on the numerical implementation of tile drain flow in the model code, a verification of the approach, and some illustrative examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach consists in using double‐continuum models to simulate flow exchanged between the systems based on differences in hydraulic head via linear exchange terms [ Barenblatt et al , 1960; Teutsch , 1988, 1989; Sauter , 1992]. A third approach couples discrete flow path networks to a continuum in order to model dualistic flows in MFKS (“hybrid models”) [ Kiraly , 1984; MacQuarrie and Sudicky , 1996; Arfib and de Marsily , 2004]. Liedl et al [2003] used such an approach by coupling a pipe network with a fractured system via linear exchange terms, with simulations of Darcian flow in the matrix done using a finite difference scheme.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no mathematical theory is available to guarantee existence of solutions and the coupling condition of the form (1.4) is not incorporated. Combining the idea of dual porosity and mimicking the numerical schemes in [9,17], the model (1.5) in [10,11,16] is solved by the Carbonate Aquifer Void Evolution (CAVE) code [18]. CAVE solves the flow in the porous matrix by a finite difference scheme using MODFLOW [19] and the flow in conduit by a nonlinear finite difference discretization.…”
Section: A the Coupled Pipe Flow/darcy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was originally borrowed from dual-porosity models [3][4][5][6]. The finite element discretization for the coupled nonlinear Richard's equation and pipe (or plane) flow is discussed in [9,17] for variably saturated porous media. However, no mathematical theory is available to guarantee existence of solutions and the coupling condition of the form (1.4) is not incorporated.…”
Section: A the Coupled Pipe Flow/darcy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation