The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007wr006288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of pumping tests in a mixed flow karst system

Abstract: [1] A long-duration pumping test performed in the conduit of a mixed flow karst system (MFKS) is analyzed and interpreted. It constitutes a unique experiment of catchment wide response of a karst system, with drawdowns measured both in the pumped conduit and in the matrix. A modeling approach is proposed for this interpretation. The developed double continuum model consists of two reservoirs -karst conduits and the surrounding carbonate rocks -between which flow exchange is modeled using the superposition prin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(40 reference statements)
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different values for hydraulic conductivity in one path may be due to the different hydraulic behavior of groundwater flow in the karst terrain during tracer and pumping tests. In a pumping test, groundwater mainly flows from the both macrofractures and matrix (Moench, 1984;Maréchal et al, 2008), while in a tracer test groundwater and dissolved dye mainly flow via the macrofracture and dissolution openings routes toward the observation points (Gouzie et al, 2010). In other words, transmission of dye in anisotropic media in tracer test is mainly via routes with minimum head loss (Salgado-Castro, 1988;Nassimi, 2011) such as dissolution-created channel and conduit (macrofracture) routes, while in a pumped well that taps anisotropic media, groundwater flows through both macrofractures and matrices in the cone of depression (Moench, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values for hydraulic conductivity in one path may be due to the different hydraulic behavior of groundwater flow in the karst terrain during tracer and pumping tests. In a pumping test, groundwater mainly flows from the both macrofractures and matrix (Moench, 1984;Maréchal et al, 2008), while in a tracer test groundwater and dissolved dye mainly flow via the macrofracture and dissolution openings routes toward the observation points (Gouzie et al, 2010). In other words, transmission of dye in anisotropic media in tracer test is mainly via routes with minimum head loss (Salgado-Castro, 1988;Nassimi, 2011) such as dissolution-created channel and conduit (macrofracture) routes, while in a pumped well that taps anisotropic media, groundwater flows through both macrofractures and matrices in the cone of depression (Moench, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a few years, improved analytical models take better into account for the different behavior of the two types of reservoirs [34] or even three reservoirs [45]. However, despite the importance of calibration for the models, temperature has not been used probably because of the non-conservative character of this signal [26,34]. In the following we will take benefit of particular periods of the pumping test to get new constraints for the models.…”
Section: Revisiting the 2005 Pumping Test Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Maréchal et al [34] we will considerer in the following the dewatering of the conduit network as a supplementary outgoing flow from the CS, Q CS .…”
Section: Period (B): Data Collected During the Step-drawdown Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations