2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c07943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Importance of Joint Mitigation Strategies for Front, Bulk, and Rear Recombination in Ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells

Abstract: On the importance of joint mitigation strategies for front, bulk and rear recombination in ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, which has been published in final form at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(299 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All J-V representative curves present similar and well diode-behaved characteristics. Hence, no evidence of unoptimized passivation contact is noted in the J-V characteristic curves, as observed in previous attempts to implement non-conventional substrates in CIGS solar cells, through a clear roll-over effect and loss of "squareness" in the J-V curves [4,38,49]. Therefore, to understand the impact of the SiOx thickness on the device optoelectronic properties, the obtained figures of merit values were compared to those of Ref device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All J-V representative curves present similar and well diode-behaved characteristics. Hence, no evidence of unoptimized passivation contact is noted in the J-V characteristic curves, as observed in previous attempts to implement non-conventional substrates in CIGS solar cells, through a clear roll-over effect and loss of "squareness" in the J-V curves [4,38,49]. Therefore, to understand the impact of the SiOx thickness on the device optoelectronic properties, the obtained figures of merit values were compared to those of Ref device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25 ] Such a concept is far from optimized for ultrathin cells. [ 35 ] Thus, other strategies, such as patterned dielectric layers, have been studied. [ 36–40 ] Moreover, in ultrathin solar cells, the absorber thickness value is lower than the optical thickness required to fully absorb the incoming light, resulting in high optical losses, which leads to a short‐circuit current density ( J sc ) value decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the intense miniaturization of optoelectronic devices, surface and interface properties become increasingly important and are often decisive for the performance of the photovoltaic module. For solar cells, a great amount of research has been made into new contacts and interface passivation strategies [1][2][3][4][5] so that interface recombination losses can be lowered. In this context, even for silicon technology that has been studied since the 1950s, new approaches with selective contacts for electron or holes are being developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%