Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL 2013 2013
DOI: 10.7551/978-0-262-31709-2-ch055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the evolution of self-organised role-allocation and role-switching behaviour in swarm robotics: a case study

Abstract: In spite of its significance for the adaptability of autonomous robotic swarms, the dynamic allocation and re-distribution of robots to tasks (i.e., role-allocation and role-switching behaviour) is still a design challenge in swarm robotics. This study investigates a simulated foraging scenario in which the variability of the environmental conditions requires that robots switch between two roles (i.e., foraging and nestpatrolling). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first simulation study that demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We maintain that this high robustness depends on the presence of a communication channel that is used to allocate the roles. If, as in previous works (Baldassarre et al, 2003;Quinn et al, 2003;Tuci et al, 2013) role allocation depends only on robots behaviour, it will tend to be situated, that is dependent on the context. This means that as the context changes, for example because the groups contains a different number of robots, then the behaviour will tend to stop functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We maintain that this high robustness depends on the presence of a communication channel that is used to allocate the roles. If, as in previous works (Baldassarre et al, 2003;Quinn et al, 2003;Tuci et al, 2013) role allocation depends only on robots behaviour, it will tend to be situated, that is dependent on the context. This means that as the context changes, for example because the groups contains a different number of robots, then the behaviour will tend to stop functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A few previous works have been devoted to the evolution of role differentiation in groups of robots (Baldassarre et al, 2003;Quinn et al, 2003;Tuci et al, 2013). Baldassarre et al (2003) evolved a group of robots for the ability to collectively navigate toward a light target.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on evolutionary collective robotics [2] [17] [20] for homogeneous robots suggest that role differentiation, which is fundamental for cooperation in natural and artificial systems, is triggered by differences in local physical interactions. In [2], a group of four robots was evolved to collectively navigate toward a light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any robot is removed, the remaining robots cease motion. In [20], a group of five robots was evolved to guard a nest and forage simultaneously. The environment had two variations that required different behaviors to maximize fitness: (i) most robots stayed in the nest while others foraged; or (ii) fewer robots stayed in the nest while others foraged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%