1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On stable crack growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
63
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When a double edged notch specimen is loaded under uniaxial tension, the fracture is dissipated in two distinct zones such as fracture process zone (or essential zone) and plastic zone (or non-essential zone). The total work of fracture W f is expressed as the sum between the two parameters of the essential work W e and the nonessential work W p , as shown by Equation (1) [2][3][4][5][6]: (1) The first term is related to the instability of the crack tip and represents the energy required to fracture the polymer in its process zone which is surface-related whereas the second term is associated with the plastic work, which is proportional to the plastic zone volume, and represents the energy consumed by various deformation mechanisms in the surrounding outer plastic zone [7][8][9]. When the typical load-displacement curve of double-notched specimen shows a maximum point at which the ligament region is fully yielded and the yielding region is necked after maximum, then may be parti- (2): (2) where W y is the mechanical energy required for yielding of the ligament region and W nt is the energy required for necking and subsequent tearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a double edged notch specimen is loaded under uniaxial tension, the fracture is dissipated in two distinct zones such as fracture process zone (or essential zone) and plastic zone (or non-essential zone). The total work of fracture W f is expressed as the sum between the two parameters of the essential work W e and the nonessential work W p , as shown by Equation (1) [2][3][4][5][6]: (1) The first term is related to the instability of the crack tip and represents the energy required to fracture the polymer in its process zone which is surface-related whereas the second term is associated with the plastic work, which is proportional to the plastic zone volume, and represents the energy consumed by various deformation mechanisms in the surrounding outer plastic zone [7][8][9]. When the typical load-displacement curve of double-notched specimen shows a maximum point at which the ligament region is fully yielded and the yielding region is necked after maximum, then may be parti- (2): (2) where W y is the mechanical energy required for yielding of the ligament region and W nt is the energy required for necking and subsequent tearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical data in the vicinity of T g are very useful to optimize the molding conditions. The essential work of fracture (EWF) method developed by Broberg [2] has been conveniently used for the examination of fracture properties of ductile thin films. When a double edged notch specimen is loaded under uniaxial tension, the fracture is dissipated in two distinct zones such as fracture process zone (or essential zone) and plastic zone (or non-essential zone).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the EWF method that originally proposed by Broberg [12] has been progressively used to evaluate the fracture toughness of polymer matrix composites [13][14][15]. The total fracture work of a specimen having a sharp crack (W f ) is partitioned into EWF (W e ), i.e., the work required to create new surface in its process zone and the non-EWF or plastic work (Wp),i.e., associated with the work done by various deformation mechanisms in the plastic zone and volume-related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method for characterization of the fracture behavior of ductile materials is called essential work of fracture (EWF), originally proposed by Broberg [9]. Compared with the J-integral method, the requirement of the specimen size for EWF method is plane-stress conditions, and the more attractive is that one only needs to know the ligament length of specimens rather than measure the crack extension as requirement of the J-integral method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%