On Sharing Spatial Data with Uncertainty Integration Amongst Multiple Robots Having Different Maps

Abstract

Information sharing is a powerful feature of multi-robot systems. Sharing information precisely and accurately is important and has many benefits. Particularly, smart information sharing can improve robot path planning. If a robot finds a new obstacle or blocked path, it can share this information with other remote robots allowing them to plan better paths. However, there are two problems with such information sharing. First, the maps of the robots may be different in nature (e.g., 2D grid-map, 3D semantic map, feature map etc.) as the sensors used by the robots for mapping and localization may be different. Even the maps generated using the same sensor (e.g., Lidar) can vary in scale or rotation and the sensors used might have different specifications like resolution or range. In such scenarios, the ‘correspondence problem’ in different maps is a critical bottleneck in information sharing. Second, the transience of the obstacles has to be considered while also considering the positional uncertainty of the new obstacles while sharing information. In our previous work, we proposed a ‘node-map’ with a confidence decay mechanism to solve this problem. However, the previous work had many limitations due to the decoupling of new obstacle’s positional uncertainty and confidence decay. Moreover, the previous work applied only to homogeneous maps. In addition, the previous model worked only with static obstacles in the environment. The current work extends our previous work in three main ways: (1) we extend the previous work by integrating positional uncertainty in the confidence decay mechanism and mathematically model the transience of newly added or removed obstacles and discuss its merits; (2) we extend the previous work by considering information sharing in heterogeneous maps build using different sensors; and (3) we consider dynamic obstacles like moving people in the environment and test the proposed method in complex scenarios. All the experiments are performed in real environments and with actual robots and results are discussed.

CARE: Cooperation of ai Robot Enablers to Create a Vibrant Society

“…The three main robots (wheelchair, walker, and service) in the Living Lab environment are all equipped with sensors capable of performing point-to-point navigation within the fixed environment. They are equipped with range lidars for mapping and localization and performing tasks, such as dynamic obstacle avoidance and responding to the user's calls [29], [30]. At the same time, each robot also has an external camera system for recognizing objects in space and performing high-level planning and object detection.…”

Special Issue on Multi-Robot Systems: Challenges, Trends, and Applications

“…Abhijeet Ravanka, Ankit A. Ravankar, Yohei Hoshino, and Yukinori Kobayashi [7] focus on another relevant challenge in multi-robot missions: uncertainty. They find information sharing as a powerful tool to deal with uncertainty in mission planning.…”

Transient Virtual Obstacles for Safe Robot Navigation in Indoor Environments

“…It is assumed that robots have a Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) module to build a map and localize themselves in it [5,6,7]. The case of multi-robot navigation has been extensively discussed in [8,9,10,11,12]. Some researchers have focussed on realizing a robot that acquires logical recognition of space [13].…”