2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-road evaluation of two Diesel exhaust aftertreatment devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulfate measurements using ion chromatography for one test showed that approximately half of the mass was sulfate related, indicating that the nucleation mode particles may be attributed to the conversion of SO 2 to SO 3 , which is likely aided by the Ptcatalytic coating on the DPF. This is consistent with results from Kittelson et al (2006) who found that the formation of nucleation particles downstream of a CRT TM increased dramatically at temperatures >300…”
Section: Particle Number Emissions By Pmp Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Sulfate measurements using ion chromatography for one test showed that approximately half of the mass was sulfate related, indicating that the nucleation mode particles may be attributed to the conversion of SO 2 to SO 3 , which is likely aided by the Ptcatalytic coating on the DPF. This is consistent with results from Kittelson et al (2006) who found that the formation of nucleation particles downstream of a CRT TM increased dramatically at temperatures >300…”
Section: Particle Number Emissions By Pmp Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, an instrument recently developed to sample the particle size distribution in engine exhaust is the engine exhaust particle sizer (EEPS) spectrometer; 17 it uses electrical mobility for classifying particle size and offers good temporal resolution (on the order of 1 sec), which is useful to characterize engine emissions under transient conditions. Kittelson et al 18 compared UFPM number concentrations emitted from a diesel truck measured with a SMPS, an EEPS, and a condensation particle counter (CPC); the latter measures the total particle number concentration with a very low particle diameter detection limit (ϳ3 nm). The EEPS tracked the CPC number concentration well but the SMPS underestimated the total particle number concentration because it did not sample particles below 10 nm, whereas the EEPS sampled particles as low as 6 nm.…”
Section: Emissions Of Ufpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kittelson et al 18 used a mobile truck equipped with UFPM measurement equipment (including an EEPS, a SMPS, and a CPC) to evaluate the emissions of that diesel truck under highway cruising conditions. The truck was equipped with two distinct DPFs: a CRT and a catalyzed CRT (CCRT).…”
Section: ϫ3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chasing tests have been used to measure the particulate matter emission characteristics in vehicle plumes using mobile laboratories (Vogt et al, 2003;Pirjola et al, 2004;Giechaskiel et al, 2005;Kittelson et al, 2006;Rönkkö et al, 2006;Casati et al, 2007;Rönkkö et al, 2007;Lemmetty et al, 2008). However, researchers have only focused on particulate matter concentration, particle size distribution, and instantaneous mass concentration measurements in smoke plumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the distance between the sample point and the exhaust nozzle is generally more than 5 m (Giechaskiel et al, 2005;Kittelson et al, 2006;Rönkkö et al, 2007;Kittelson et al, 2008;Bergmann et al, 2009) and can reach as high as 100 m (Vogt et al, 2003;Casati et al, 2007). However, German researchers (Uhrner et al, 2007;Wehner et al, 2009;Uhrner et al, 2011) designed a new device that can be installed on the back of a car, and the sampling point can be adjusted within the range of 45-90 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%