2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4968823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On reduction of current leakage in GaN by carbon-doping

Abstract: Carbon-doping is proposed to reduce the dislocation-mediated leakage currents in the GaN buffer layers. GaN:C grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy using propane shows excellent quality up to [C] = 6.7 × 1018 cm−3. Locally probing dislocations by surface scanning potential microscopy reveal a transition from mostly neutral or weakly charged regions to dominantly negatively charged regions relative to the surrounding area at high doping levels. A relation between leakage currents and the relative dislocatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, C-related donors could actually be closer to EC or even be modelled as completely ionized doping, in agreement with recent hybridfunctional DFT calculations [14], [26]. Further, an experimental indication that C doping introduces donors besides acceptors is found in [27]. According to previous reports, for moderate C doping concentration (i.e., ≤10 18 cm −3 ) it is appropriate to model dopants as discrete point defects, whereas for concentrations of about (or higher than) 10 19 cm −3 it is more appropriate to use a defect-band model [28].…”
Section: Modeling Frameworksupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed, C-related donors could actually be closer to EC or even be modelled as completely ionized doping, in agreement with recent hybridfunctional DFT calculations [14], [26]. Further, an experimental indication that C doping introduces donors besides acceptors is found in [27]. According to previous reports, for moderate C doping concentration (i.e., ≤10 18 cm −3 ) it is appropriate to model dopants as discrete point defects, whereas for concentrations of about (or higher than) 10 19 cm −3 it is more appropriate to use a defect-band model [28].…”
Section: Modeling Frameworksupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The choice of the C-doping model adopted in this work is justified by the fact that by adjusting the donor-acceptor auto-compensation ratio it is possible to accurately reproduce dynamic effects in different AlGaN/GaN power HEMTs [9]- [13]. Moreover, a higher donor concentration in C-doped GaN compared to the donor density measured in unintentionally doped samples was experimentally confirmed in [14], and attributed to the auto-compensation between C related donors and acceptors, as assumed here. Finally, a similar C-doping model with high donor-acceptor auto-compensation was found also by other authors to be instrumental to reproduce breakdown effects in C-doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by means of device simulations [15].…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 91%
“…19,20 In wafer II, the low N D $ 1 Â 10 16 cm À3 was achieved by lightly carbon doping 21 to compensate the non-intentional-doping. 3, 21 Wafer IV was used as a reference, and it was not optimized to lower the N D in n À -GaN and increase N D in n þ -GaN. This wafer was also used to calibrate our simulation model for a large range of variations in device structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%