IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/asscc.2011.6123655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On overcoming the limitations of single-ended signaling for graphics memory interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, single-ended signaling is considered more pin efficient. Given the same pin count, the single-ended interface can operate at lower data rate per bit but still achieve the same aggregated bandwidth to meet the system requirement [1]. Modern high-end graphics systems need larger memory bandwidth but meanwhile have been close to or already reached the I/O density and thermal dissipation limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, single-ended signaling is considered more pin efficient. Given the same pin count, the single-ended interface can operate at lower data rate per bit but still achieve the same aggregated bandwidth to meet the system requirement [1]. Modern high-end graphics systems need larger memory bandwidth but meanwhile have been close to or already reached the I/O density and thermal dissipation limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Simulations were performed to analyze the transfer function of impact of crosstalk in multiple scenarios [5]. The key take-away from the simulation results in Figure 4 is the fact that particularly for the links that are analyzed in TBI II test system the impact of crosstalk is minimal when compared to commercial GDDR5 systems.…”
Section: B Crosstalk Analysis On Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%