2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line submicellar enhanced fluorometric determination of Se(IV) with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that fluorescence intensity increases as the DAN to selenium molar ratio increases from 20 to 50, becomes steady when the ratio is varied from 50 to 500 and decreases slightly afterwards. As reported in literature (Pedro, Andrade, Magni, Tudino, & Bonivardi, 2004) when the ratio of DAN to selenium was increased above 50, blank readings were also increased. Optimum DAN to selenium molar ratio was found to be 50.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Molar Dan/selenium Ratiosupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It was observed that fluorescence intensity increases as the DAN to selenium molar ratio increases from 20 to 50, becomes steady when the ratio is varied from 50 to 500 and decreases slightly afterwards. As reported in literature (Pedro, Andrade, Magni, Tudino, & Bonivardi, 2004) when the ratio of DAN to selenium was increased above 50, blank readings were also increased. Optimum DAN to selenium molar ratio was found to be 50.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Molar Dan/selenium Ratiosupporting
confidence: 57%
“…We have chosen the RP HPLC method for quantifying selenium described in our previous paper, the adaptation of the widely used fluorimetric analysis of selenium after derivatization with 2,3-diaminonaphtalene. The big advantage of this method is good selectivity and efficiency as well as low detection limit, comparable with that in AAS method (Hawkes and Kutnik, 1996;Pedro et al, 2004;Turlo et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, despite these assays offer great sensitivity and versatility, they show several drawbacks such as the poor solubility of DAN in water and its toxicity. Moreover, there is a great difficulty in employing the method to detect traces of nitrite and selenite in certain aqueous samples because of high blank values, as well as the fluorescence quenching, and interference by inherent biological substances and colorimetric chemicals, which often complicate the accurate detection of the analytes [32][33][34]. In addition, for the selenium determination, the product formed in aqueous medium must be extracted with organic solvents, such as cyclohexane, in order to improve the sensitivity of the method, since 4,5-benzopiazselenol shows a very low fluorescent quantum yield in water [23,33,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%