2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2015.7131199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On generalized eigenvector space for target detection in reduced dimensions

Abstract: The detection and estimation problems with large dimensional vectors frequently appear in the phased array radar systems equipped with, possibly, several hundreds of receiving elements. For such systems, a preprocessing stage reducing the large dimensional input to a manageable dimension is required. The present work shows that the subspace spanned by the generalized eigenvectors of signal and noise covariance matrices is the optimal subspace to this aim from several different viewpoints. Numerical results on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarity transformation does not affect the cost function since generalized eigenvectors diagonalize this term [44]. Hence, alternative representations of GEB can be used without loss of performance.…”
Section: Appendix C Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity transformation does not affect the cost function since generalized eigenvectors diagonalize this term [44]. Hence, alternative representations of GEB can be used without loss of performance.…”
Section: Appendix C Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing S (g) with S (g) A results in a similarity transformation for the second term in the determinant in (12), i.e., A −1 [S (g) ] H R (g) η S (g) −1 [S (g) ] H R (g) s S (g) A. Similarity transformation does not affect the cost function since generalized eigenvectors diagonalize this term [41]. Hence, alternative representations of GEB can be used without loss of performance.…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, L g − 1 have useful properties explained in Appendix I. Briefly, the D × D positive semi-definite SNR (g) mimo (l) matrix in the spatial domain can be regarded as the generalized definition of the beamformer output snr for general rank signal models [34], [38] 16 . As it was shown in our previous work [38], Tr SNR (6), and the other elements are set to zero.…”
Section: A Joint Angle-delay Domain Reduced Rank Mmse Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the D × D positive semi-definite SNR (g) mimo (l) matrix in the spatial domain can be regarded as the generalized definition of the beamformer output snr for general rank signal models [34], [38] 16 . As it was shown in our previous work [38], Tr SNR (6), and the other elements are set to zero. In (22), the SNR (g) mimo (l) matrix is responsible for spatial processing only, utilizing the eigenspaces of the intended group g at l th delay and the inter-group interference after subspace projection onto S In order to harness the spatial multiplexing in each group, one consider the effective multi-path channel vector of each group user h…”
Section: A Joint Angle-delay Domain Reduced Rank Mmse Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation