2000
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1019737664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On excursion sets, tube formulas and maxima of random fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
191
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
191
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the disparity maps, it is straightforward to compute the depths of the corresponding 3-D points and their heights with respect to an average plane via triangulation (see Hartley and Sturm, 1997). In the following, we will estimate directional spectra from the reconstructed wave surface and the observed wave extremes in space-time will be compared against theoretical models based on Euler Characteristics (Adler, 1981;Adler, 2000;Adler and Taylor, 2007).…”
Section: Stereo Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the disparity maps, it is straightforward to compute the depths of the corresponding 3-D points and their heights with respect to an average plane via triangulation (see Hartley and Sturm, 1997). In the following, we will estimate directional spectra from the reconstructed wave surface and the observed wave extremes in space-time will be compared against theoretical models based on Euler Characteristics (Adler, 1981;Adler, 2000;Adler and Taylor, 2007).…”
Section: Stereo Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Theorem 1 underscores the intimate connection between model selection and the distribution of the maxima of random fields. In general, the maximum of random processes and fields is a well studied challenging mathematical problem with a rich history, see for example [2], [3] and references therein. For our purposes, we shall use the following result (see Theorem 2 and Lemma 1 below): For large n,…”
Section: B a New Model Selection Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under quite general assumptions, there are accurate asymptotic approximations for the probability of exceedance ( [11], [4], [32] for example). For our purposes, we will use the following well known result for the case of a stationary Gaussian process (proposition 4.1 in [32]).…”
Section: A Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%