1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-6636(87)90032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Eshelby's inclusion problem in a three-phase spherically concentric solid, and a modification of Mori-Tanaka's method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First the elastic parameters of the materials are related to their porosities. Luo and Weng [10] proposed a homogenization method relating the effective bulk and shear moduli to the porosity of the solid. Using this approach, the effective Young's modulus decreases monotonically with the porosity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First the elastic parameters of the materials are related to their porosities. Luo and Weng [10] proposed a homogenization method relating the effective bulk and shear moduli to the porosity of the solid. Using this approach, the effective Young's modulus decreases monotonically with the porosity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, upper panel) was then recorded for different external stresses, σ 0 , and elastic constants (E, ν). The elastic constants were computed from homogenization relations between elasticity and porosity [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that the results of the generalized self-consistent method have excellent agreement with the experimental data (for example, refer to Huang et al, 1994). The three-phase model is also used to improve the accuracy of the Mori-Tanaka method (Luo and Weng, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The pros and cons of the Mori-Tanaka method have been discussed by Christensen (1990) and Christensen et al (1992). The generalized self-consistent method is a more sophisticated micromechanics approach (Christensen and Lo, 1979;Luo and Weng, 1987;Christensen, 1993;Huang and Hu, 1995;Cheung, 1998, 2001;Riccardi and Montheilet, 1999;. Different from the aforementioned micromechanics methods based on the two-phase model, the generalized self-consistent method is based on a threephase model: an inclusion is embedded in a finite matrix, which in turn is embedded in an infinite composite with the as-yet-unknown effective moduli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neglecting the interaction of particles is an unrealistic assumption of Eshelby for materials with randomly dispersed particulate microstructure, even at a few percent volume fraction [89]. Further proposed models such as Mori-Tanaka [90][91][92], the self-consistent scheme [93][94][95][96][97][98], the generalized self-consistent scheme [99][100][101][102][103], and the differential method [104,105] are mainly based on the mean-field approximation [106] and approximate the interaction between the phases. The extension of these models to account for the electroelastic behavior of composite materials was addressed by Dunn and Taya [107].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%