1994
DOI: 10.1137/1138044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Refinement of the Central Limit Theorem for Sums of Independent Random Indicators

Abstract: Explicit and rather tight upper bounds for the distance (in the uniform metric) between the distribution function of a sum of independent random indicators and its asymptotic expansion are obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, upon comparing the WTW projection (at the level t = 0.01, for the year 2000) obtained by running the skewness-corrected Gaussian approximation with the projection based on the full Poisson-Binomial distribution, we found that 20%  of the statistically-significant links are lost in the Gaussian-based validated projection. The limitations of the Gaussian approximations are discussed in further detail in [42,43].…”
Section: Appendix B Approximations Of the Poisson-binomial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, upon comparing the WTW projection (at the level t = 0.01, for the year 2000) obtained by running the skewness-corrected Gaussian approximation with the projection based on the full Poisson-Binomial distribution, we found that 20%  of the statistically-significant links are lost in the Gaussian-based validated projection. The limitations of the Gaussian approximations are discussed in further detail in [42,43].…”
Section: Appendix B Approximations Of the Poisson-binomial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently many other proofs of this result and similar ones were given using a range of different techniques; [3,14,24,31] is a sampling of work along these lines, and Steele [50] gives an extensive list of relevant references. Much work has also been done on approximating PBDs by normal distributions (see e.g., [2,29,38,51]) and by Binomial distributions (see e.g., [28,44,48]). These results provide structural information about PBDs that can be well-approximated via simpler distributions, but fall short of our goal of obtaining approximations of an unknown PBD up to arbitrary accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the number of f -recurrent runs in a sequence of independent random variables was studied by Mikhailov [16,17]. Similar results for the number of usual and f -recurrent runs with possible omissions of letters were obtained by Mezhennaya in [14] and [15], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%